refining

This experience has enlightened and educated me about a place that I am vividly familiar with versus a location that I have never been to. It is a really an uplifting experience that adds on to the practice of introspection and noticing. 

While I have focused on tiny little aspects that go unnoticed in Brunswick, it is also important to also see the overviewing aspects of the place to truly capture what one would expect when visiting the town. I have never been to Brunswick so these images were taken from a fresh set of eyes and perspective; it is important to see any location with this type of mindset and point of view. This newly-found skill can definitely be applied to future projects and upcoming assessment tasks for Seeing the Unseen. 

In terms of making media, I would like to further refine these skills by practicing this type of noticing – this also includes the consideration of the angles, lighting, composition and so much more aspects that come with photography, filmmaking and media-making in general. By applying this type of perspective that was attained from my experience in this task, I hope to become a type of media-maker where I can immerse my audience in my perspective.

~ Queries and Questions ~ 

  1. How can I further expand this new perspective that I have gained?
  2. How can I use this skill to improve my artistry and use of the camera?

These are some of the questions that I have been pondering about before and whilst undergoing this task – within this studio, I would like those questions to be my form of motivation and my progression as a media maker this semester.

Lyreca.

reflecting

What are the differences and similarities between what you expected to notice and what you recorded? 

Previously mentioned in my prompt post, my expectations of Brunswick were mostly of cafés and eateries that catered to the brunch culture in Melbourne. However, reflecting upon on the photos, it was clearly not the case. My photos seldom had any images of food, let alone cafès and eateries. It consisted of close-up shots of the objects and mainly bits of pieces of Brunswick:

An example of Brunswick’s little bits and pieces were these fabrics from the fabric shop. I was taken aback to come across shops like these. My expectations of Brunswick were of a modern image with newly-opened restaurants but in reality, it was an old town that widely contained run-down shops (this is not necessarily a bad thing), opportunity shops and so much more. It was like any other old suburb I visited, suburbs such as Niddrie, Fitzroy, Northcote, etc. It definitely had the atmosphere of an old, Victorian style town. That was the difference in my observation of Brunswick – what I expected to notice beforehand.

On the other hand, the similarities between my expectations of what I was going to notice versus what I was going to I recorded was very little – as I previously said, my expectations of noticing were going to be of cafès and eateries, however, I did not record anything that involved a cafè or better yet, anything brunch related. The only thing I can mention about the similarity that coincided between my expectations and what I recorded was capturing the culture of Brunswick – it was really the little details that encapsulated and therefore, fulfilled my aim of my expectations with my recordings.

Moving on, Lizzie’s form of recording versus mine was very different, proving the versatility of our ability to notice. We did not discuss how we would notice and record with a certain style except for what kind of tools we would use to notice. Thus, this resulted in both unique forms of noticing; Lizzie had aimed to notice Hosier Lane from one perspective of the location whilst everything around her changes.

(Courtesy of Lizzie’s noticing post)

On the other hand, I had decided to walk around a small area of Brunswick and capture whatever caught my attention. This was also proven in out videos – Lizzie wanted to highlight the traffic of people that were coming in and out of Hosier Lane, while I recorded places and objects that were unmoving and unapparent to the people around what I noticed (except for one of the footage with the woman walking her dog). This both displays our different ways of noticing and interacting the environment around us. Our collaboration helped us both see our places in a new perspective, broadening our capacity to be introspective.

In relation to the Bogost reading, I based it on Bogost’s theory on photography – he describes photography as “commonplace” that some or most media makers ignore its practicality. I agree with Bogost in this statement, seemingly as we sometimes want to photograph for artificial purposes. I believe that this project has led me to understand what Bogost was saying, and that we should not take the power of photography for granted. It presents so many dynamics and complexities that we have yet to understand about the world – it helps us see what cannot be seen by the naked eye. I previously would not have gone to the lengths of recording what I recorded in Brunswick but after this experience and Bogost’s reading, I will do more of it from now on.

At the same time, Patrick Pound’s exhibition can be partially acknowledged for the production of these images and videos. His hobby/work to collect has inspired me to be more aware of what was going on around Brunswick and the world in general. Each individual and item has so much character and story to tell in his exhibition that I wanted to capture what Brunswick had to offer.

Overall, my work has highly been influenced by Bogost’s take on photography and Pound’s extensive range of collection of various things. This has shaped the result of my work and has provided Lizzie and I a different perspective of Brunswick.

Lyreca.

 

prompt

Lizzie and I have decided to notice our locations based on the time limit and formula of 10 pictures in 10 minutes (thus, 1 image per minute) and a 10-second video of the chosen location.

In my mind, I knew this task was definitely going to be related to the Bogost reading where he describes ontography in great detail – “Ontography is an aesthetic set theory, in which a particular configuration is celebrated merely on the basis of its existence” (Bogost, 2012). In relation to noticing, ontography plays a crucial part especially in the collection of our thoughts and what we immediately notice. In this case, what we notice in the location chosen for us – Lizzie chose Brunswick as my area of noticing/observation.

I thought it would be a good idea to use this reading as a starting point and preparation for the task because of the reading’s segment of “Visual Ontographs” – Bogost, first of all, discusses the ontography in its simplest form – lists. He then implements its simplicity onto a different medium that is, photographs. This is highly relevant and helpful to our process of collection mainly because Lizzie and I will be utilising visuals as part of our task of noticing.

The process invites the artist to see the scene to be captured separately from the way the camera will see it.

Meanwhile, I ponder about Brunswick and its unique culture and wonder what it has in place for me to explore – having no experience with Brunswick, I was preparing myself to see this suburb of Melbourne and also set myself up some expectations. Here is a chat between Lizzie and myself, explaining to her some the assumptions I had about Brunswick, after exploring the area. I also included my conclusion of the place and how it proved me wrong about some of my earlier assumptions.

My speculations about Brunswick, without any research, was the thriving brunch culture. Both Instagram and word of mouth from friends showcased what Brunswick had to offer in terms of the foodie culture. However, I was taken aback with the other aspects once I arrived – that shall be explained in my reflection post. Overall, Bogost’s posts and our time limit to record the media assisted in the process of noticing our chosen locations.

Lyreca.

noticing

Whilst playing back the pieces of media I have collected, there is a reoccurring theme that I have noticed within the photos. Rather than an obvious ‘element’ within these pictures, it is the style of the photographs, the way they were taken that has a similar effect happening throughout these images. If it was not obvious already, the close-up shots are the similarities and are what connects these images from one another – I really wanted to capture the feel and culture of Brunswick and by utilising the power of a close-up, this has been achieved. A great example is the image of the telephone booth, more so the close-up of the phone’s buttons. I decided to pay particular attention to this “ancient artefact” due to the lack of attention it receives in this day and age. As smart phone users, we are all so absorbed in its convenience that we barely acknowledge the existence of a telephone booth. In relation to the town of Brunswick, I thought this dated piece of item would be a perfect fit to Brunswick’s culture – old-fashioned and nostalgic with a somewhat vintage twist. Of course, there are also medium and long shots (the tram, the mural on the brick wall and the historical building) in the series of my photos in order to get a better view of the overall location.

The following image depicts my on-the-spot analysis of my own collection as I showed my group mate, Lizzie my photos and video of Brunswick;

(Please click the photo to see it in a higher resolution)

On the bottom half of my notes, I point out the colours, shapes and texture that one usually would not notice on a normal day. I really made it a point to get the little bits of pieces in the town of Brunswick to get an overall feel and experience of this part of Melbourne that I have never been to. In a way, I am showing the audience more of the unnoticed details rather than the other aspects that are easily noticed.

My Location – Hosier Lane 

An aspect that I had not noticed but Lizzie focused on was the traffic of people coming in and out of Hosier Lane. We clearly both had different intentions when it came to visiting the graffiti lane – I would come in with an intent to photograph artworks and pose with the graffiti/artworks whilst Lizzie came in the lane with the purpose to photograph and deliberately notice what was going on within the location. Here is a list that Lizzie had noticed during her moments of ‘unfamiliar noticing’:

  • The lane accommodated to both tourists and the locals, these groups were usually families
  • The artworks and mural, of course – the detailing of the street art and how it constantly changes in comparison to the previous time Lizzie visited Hosier Lane.
  • Restaurants and cafés

I would say that we both had a similar experience with Hosier Lane, relating to the artwork, restaurant and cafes. Otherwise, it was really about the people that Lizzie had focused on, people from all different backgrounds especially tourists and also families that were interested in Melbourne’s hotspots. With such a small location, there is so little that you can notice within the area, especially in a place both well-known to the locals and the tourists.

Lyreca.

workshop 11

Write a reflection of what you learnt about the audio editing process. What worked? What didn’t? What do you need to practice more and why? What will help with your final collaborative project?

What worked in our favour was the collaboration of ideas and teamwork, essentially. What didn’t work however was the fact that our h2n zoom was FUCKED. Excuse me for the terrible language but you’ll know what I’m talking about once you’ve heard the audio. I had to jack up the volume to its highest on Audition whilst editing. In terms of practice, it’s really just about having patience and better time management with the program. With the collaborative project, it’ll help us strengthen our bond as a team and of course, expand our technical skills with this newly introduced program, Audition! It’s not much of a headache Premiere Pro, I’ll say that.

lyreca

 

the final workshop #12

The workshop began with its usual formalities and such, however I sat with my group members this time around – Alice and Izzi! The purpose of this workshop (well, for me) was to work on our rough cuts so the ~REAL~ audio people could come in and critique our work. I managed to get a minute’s worth of work done in the 50 minutes of time we were, which I’d say is pretty good progress:

And finally, these two lovely radio people finally came in to listen to our audios. We had to set up this cool audio thingamabob where we could listen to the audio all at once. The first piece of audio was about ‘Social Media and its Unreliability’. Okay, that’s not the exact title but that’s what I got off of it whilst I was listening to this beautifully edited piece of work. It was conversational, engaging and interesting – this group made sure if wasn’t just the three of them simply talking – they took their time to piece every bit of section together. It honestly made me kind of nervous considering our group has done NADA in terms of putting everything together.

It was our turn to present our audio – we started off with Izzi as she researched the information of hip hop’s history. Next was myself, discussing hip hop’s distortion of its messages and finally, Alice asking the question of “where did women in hip hop go?. Of course I wasn’t expecting praises because honestly, our work was very segmented and didn’t sound too-put-together just yet. Otherwise here are the dot points of the feedback:

  • Clear sections in the segments – changes of pace and have a break in between to give the listener a break
  • Topic change/section change – it’s an opportunity to change the beat, cut the beat, etc
  • Equalise the volume throughout the three different audios (of course, once we have pieced all of them together)

The feedback from a professional was very helpful and educational about the process of editing an audio – I will definitely put these pieces of advice into my work! Before it was time to go, we asked Liam for some final ~*words of wisdom*~

“Great job, guys”

Thanks Liam 😂

lyreca

the workshop for this week #9

Everyone entered the room with a somewhat anxious gut feeling, mainly because it was time to pick out the groups. I’ll be honest but I zoned out during the discussion so I don’t even remember what Liam and the class was talking about in detail. However, I’d still like to list down my vague recollections of week nine’s workshop:

  • the collaborative contract template
  • the project brief for assignment #4
  • what an annotated bibliography is
  • what is a SWOT analysis? personal experience: i did business in like year 10 and psychology in VCE lmao so I do have a fair knowledge of how to use a swot analysis
  • and how to use a zoom hand recorder H2N

What I actually want to focus on this blog post is the group aspect of the workshop: meeting our group members. We decided with the old-fashioned “picking out from the hat” method. I low-key preferred this method rather than choosing our own group members because it enables us to expand our horizons and let’s us get to know new people! And it actually worked quite well in my case because I got paired up with the people all the way on the other side of the room – people I’ve never had a social interaction with.

Now, the beginning of our collaboration was getting to know the H2N recorder. It’s so complicated for a mic recorder and I’m actually not sure why it has to be? In comparison to the Sony MC50, this microphone was hard to get around I was fortunate enough to be paired with someone who has had experience with it (shoutout to Izzy!). We went out to the hustle and bustle of Swanston St and recorded all sorts of things for the activity – from trams to interviews, we wanted to encapsulate our experience at RMIT! I’d say overall that it was a good teamwork as a starter despite the absence of our other group mate.

lyreca 🐹

the lectorial for this week #9

I was actually planning to merge the reading and lectorial post together but i realised that the topics discussed were so vastly different. Let’s talk collaboration. We had a guest speaker this week and I’d like to deeply apologising for forgetting her name but she is definitely a familiar face. Here are some notes I wrote down and took to very serious consideration:

  • Employers are looking for people who “like working collaboratively and enjoy working as part of a team” This is very true for ALL industries. You’re bound to work with other people no matter what job you undertake – two heads are better than one after all and one person can’t single-handedly operate a whole organisation.
  • Careers in media mainly consist of collaborative jobs – it is a BASELINE skill set. This should already be a preconceived notion if you are in any way interested in entering the field of Media. Massive productions require people of different abilities and talents in order to produce whatever is needed to be produced. This does not only apply to movie productions but also as radio stations, publications, etc.

(Source)

Here is a lame stock image of what “TEAMWORK” looks like!.In a perfect world, all teamwork would look like this – smiles and mutual agreement with one another. But in a REAL world, everything has its pros and cons:

PROS

Having a good leader, feedback – making ideas better, spreading the workload, teaching each other things

CONS

Having a ‘dictator’ in the group, creative differences, lazy team members, conflict, project lacks unity or eventually dies because of no ownership

No matter what group you may be placed in, whether it’s with your friends or not, everyone is going to encounter situations mentioned above. As a part-time perfectionist, I try my best to stick with the pros of teamwork but alas, not everyone is a perfectionist. What you can only do to manage and cope with collaboration is having experience. I guess that’s why universities are big on teamwork, huh? That’s really all I can say and reflect about teamwork. Inside and outside of education, we are constantly interacting with different people of different walks of life and to me, that is what collaboration is about.

lyreca, 2017

👩‍👦‍👦  <– a team!

workshop numero sei

I missed out on week #6’s workshop due to extenuating circumstances (lol jks i was busy writing a paper) but anywho I decided to snoop around my fellow classmates’ blog posts and got a general idea of what to do!

Before, I present to you the masterpiece of a video hahahaha I would like to reiterate the importance of PRE-production. You simply can’t burden everything onto post-production because your past mistakes will make editing a living hell for you. For that reason, this was my approach on pre-production:

I followed the process of scripting the shot, however, I did not go through with the storyboard and replaced it with directing where the “talent/s” would placed within the setting.

Which is why we had to shoot with a continuous shot, perhaps. I obviously missed out class discussion about this and what their opinion may be but we gotta remember to give a bit more love to pre-production than what it deserves.

Here is my take on the continuous shot of “Misunderstandings”.

I played around with my friends whilst filming this and it took at least 5 takes for us to somewhat perfect this. A little disagreement here and there and it also took me out of my comfort zone as I’m not used to the role of a leader. Nonetheless, we ended up with this and I’m 85% satisfied with the finished product. It’s all about practice so I’m not too fussed.

lyreca 😎

 

workshop #5

“Our eyes create art”

On a somewhat cold day of week number five, Lyreca had no knowledge that her Media 1 class would be operating on cameras (Sony MC50, to be exact). She came into class unprepared, with a million things in her mind about the upcoming assessments and especially this interview project. This activity would be the perfect task to keep her busy mind in check, especially with all the dread about these assignments slowly drawing near her. Right?

One thing I can say about this video – shitty audio.

Undergoing Thursday’s task was definitely unexpected as I have previously mentioned. I think it’s better to put the series of event in a list so here goes:

  1. Liam directed us to the ~hub~ of borrowing equipment, which was just downstairs from the class. I’m not sure why but the people reminded me of the typical, flannel-wearing (with a cigarette in their mouth) film-school graduates. I mean their outfits just said it all. They seemed like cool people though. They pretty much told us the house-keeping rules – borrowing equipment, being on the blacklist, that kind of stuff.
  2. Back to the classroom again, Liam explained to us the basics of how to operate the MC50, along with the tripod. He told us the basics such as the establishing shot and the 180° line. This is something I’ve already read about from the subject Introduction to Cinema Studies. Doing these two subjects together definitely correlates with one another, therefore, helping me with all technicalities.
  3. We chose the grass area as our location, because of its convenience – students hanging out on the grass, studying, doing whatever a student is supposed to do, I guess?
  4. We filmed what we were supposed to film – we interviewed each group member, but for some unexplainable reason, I didn’t get to share my piece of advice. Nonetheless, I got my turn on operating the camera so I’m not too fussed by it (but I would’ve liked some screen time, though 😅).
  5. Group activities are definitely something I need to work on. I need to stand my ground when it comes to creativity and ideas that I believe in. Some problems that were encountered was definitely the creative differences between us girls and who operated the camera (positioning angles, for example). These differences however, were mitigated by Premiere Pro – we decided that if any error happens, we could always fix it through the editing process.
  6. I think the quality of the video will show the type of interdependence we had on the day – one of the most successful camera shots were the ones with the clearest audio, as Liam stated that audio will be the or mostly the main focus for the upcoming project. Why else would you watch an interview with bad audio?
  7. in my opinion, the camerawork was sort of mediocre, including the audio. Overall, this translated as a somewhat mediocre piece of work for me – I don’t blame it entirely on the camerawork/audio/production. This also goes towards the post-production process done by the editor, but hey, it’s all part of trial and error.
  8. Finally, something I’ve discovered about camera technique? Like I said before, audio really matters! Therefore, the framing and the composition of the shot contributes to producing an audio where you can hear the person speaking. Note: The only shot we didn’t get to take was the interviewee’s POV or perhaps the camera behind the interviewee.

That’s it for now,

lyreca 👀