Archive of ‘Week 5’ category

John Oliver: The Best Interviewer of All Time (or just really funny)

If you can, look past the incredibly awkward excitement that a segment about our entire country was featured on American TV and watch one of the greatest interviewers currently popularized (in my opinion).
John Oliver is an incredibly influential media producer.  Originally a comedian, he got his big break working on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart.  From there, he was able to start his own late night talk show, Last Week Tonight, which deals with different news stories and political/economic issues in America.  His segments on Last Week Tonight have been credited in changing court rulings, legislation, and regulations in the US, a effect known as ‘The John Oliver Effect’.  His show has caused surges in donations to charities mentioned (such as The Society of Women Engineers) and clips from his show go viral often, with his Donald Drumpf segment reaching 85 million views within a month, the highest in HBO’s history.  This success is owed in no small part to his ability to interview, and weave those interviews into stories.

The above segment about gun control in the US vs in Australia was incredibly popular when it came out in 2013.  Oliver was able to use his interview skills to get the soundbite ‘whoop-de-doo’ from the ‘villain’ of the piece, Philip van Cleave, in response to Australia’s gun violence declining significantly as a direct result of gun control.  Towards the end of the interview, Oliver was even able to get van Cleave to accidentally agree with Oliver’s argument.
This style of confrontational, bias interview was made incredibly popular by The Daily Show with John Stewart.  Oliver was not the only one who enacted change via his interviews.  Aasif Mandvi, another correspondent on the show, performed an interview with Don Yelton about voter ID laws.  During this interview, Don Yelton made many blatantly racist statements, and this interview resulted in his resignation.

John Oliver, however, has been one of the most successful of The Daily Show’s correspondents, alongside Stephen Colbert, Samantha Bee and Trevor Noah.  As mentioned previously, his show has been incredibly influential and a great part of this is attested to his ability to interview, and who he is willing to interview,sometimes without the permission of HBO.  One such interview took place in Russia with controversial whistle-blower, Edward Snowden, about government surveillance.  Oliver used his skills as an interviewer to both get Snowden to admit that turning over the NSA documents without reading them all was a mistake, and explain to the viewers what different factions of the NSA do by putting it in terms the audience would understand.

(Interview starts at 13:30)

In today’s society, news can be incredibly difficult to understand.  As we are being constantly bombarded with information through social media, television, radio, and printed news sources, it can be difficult to understand the root of an issue, or even what the issue is.  John Oliver is, in my opinion, one of the greatest interviewers of all time as he is able to take an interviewee’s words and spin it into a digestible story that can be understood by everyone.  He is also unafraid of taking a hard stance with even the kindest man on Earth, the Dalai Lama, about the issues surrounding his reincarnation and what his death could mean for the Tibetan people.

Overall, he gets his point across in interviews. He knows his audience, and how to help the general public understand what someone is saying, and he is not afraid to press his interviewees to get answers to difficult questions.

Pent-orial

I’m sad to say that I didn’t complete the task assigned to us this week.

We were to conduct an interview about the first six weeks of university.  We were meant to interview two different people, and have multiple different types of shots including establishing shots and action shots.
I feel that where our group went wrong was in the planning stage.  Rather than sitting down and figuring out what we wanted, we instead ran straight into the filming process and got muddled along the way.  We wanted to take a comedy route, but lacked the planning for getting the answers we needed in order to take this spin.
There were also communication difficulties.  We would ask a specific question and rather than answering it, we would talk about the overall concept again.  This lead to a lot of confusion when shooting.

Although other members of our group were able to edit the footage together, I was unable to find a way to edit the footage and have a coherent story, or even the story we were originally trying to tell.  This class taught me a lot about working in groups, and especially working with people you don’t know too well (as would be the case on most shoots).  Hopefully on the next shoot, we take more time to plan out what we are going to capture.

Lecture Week 5

This week, we had a guest lecturer, Louise Turley.  She talked about the interview process, breaking it down into the 5 W’s (who, what, when, where, why).  Within in these, she gave us questions to ask ourselves before, during, and after an interview (eg Who is my audience?Why was this interview good/not good?).  I found this really helpful, as the reading this week got very stuck into the specifics of interviewing professionally, and I found it difficult to connect to the basics of HOW to conduct a good interview.  Louise was very easy to understand, and while she stressed how difficult good interviewing skills are to develop, she made the whole process seem more ‘doable’.

After she left, Brian went over narrative structure, and how this can be incorporated into a good interview.  He explained the three act structure…
ACT I: Setup – who is the character? what is the character’s goals? what is the environment the character is in? FIRST ACT TURNING POINT (action begins)
ACT 2: Escalation of complications: antagonist causes trouble, protagonist tries to solve problems, SECOND ACT TURNING POINT (character hits lowest point)
ACT 3: Climax – confrontation of issues, character solves (or doesn’t solve) troubles, action dies down, character returns to old world/begins new life.
This structure is clear to see in fiction, but it can also be seen in non-fiction.  Most wars fought, for example, fit into this three act structure in some way.  By the same token, interviews can be constructed to fit this three act structure, even if it is a short interview.

The following things are what I hope to explore after this lecture…
-Having the interviewee as the antagonist in the story (eg John Oliver interviewing Philip Van Cleeve for The Daily Show)
-Constructing narrative in shorter time periods (eg 1 minute interviews)
-The development of questions that don’t explicitly pry but manage to open a can of worms
-Reality TV interviews and the manipulation that goes on behind the scenes to help construct narrative