In the two-minute test video, I tried to use the elevator as the transition effect, along with the opening of the elevator door to show different scenes. Among them, the ideas of the footages which are shooting pedestrians crossing the road, playing table tennis, the uni’s sky garden are working. In the busy life on weekdays, people always walk with “purpose”. For example, when I want to walk from building10 to building12, I will choose the same route every time, the purpose is to reach building12 quickly, and as I am too familiar with this route, so I didn’t pay special attention to and discovered some things on the road. The tram, the chair and the traffic lights are not working because they are easy to notice and people always use them in the daily life. From the reading, “Different facets, different networks, all relations. These are some of the relational lines that might run with an ordinary teaspoon.”(2018) There are certain connections in any different things. It seems that there is no correlation between these footages taken so far, but in fact they have some relationship and commonality. This gives me lots of inspiration in editing, and I will connect them together by finding and discovering the relationship between them, rather than bluntly splicing them all together. In the final media artefact, I will still use the elevator as the transition effect to show different scenes, while also showing a timeline from going out during the day to going home at night. From the feedback, I need to collect more clips from top, look up and other different perspectives, find and grab more unnoticed qualities.
Reference: Miles, A., Weidle, F., Brasier, H., Lessard, B., 2018. From Critical Distance to Critical Intimacy: Interactive Documentary and Relational Media, in: Cammaer, G., Fitzpatrick, B., Lessard, B. (Eds.), Critical Distance in Documentary Media. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 301–319.

