Assignment 3- Reflection SUBTERFUGE

This project has been a very big learning experience for me, in terms of dealing with other creatives as well as production work. However, this project has taught me how to observe and assess social and political issues in the world, and incorporate them into the stories that I write.

I think that our project was somewhat successful in provoking thought into issues surrounding refugees and government action. However I don’t think we focused enough on refugees, as our characters just seemed to be characters that were screwed over by the government. I do believe however that we explored issues regarding government cover-ups and controversial people in power to a good extent. I think adding in the storyline of the native tribe was a mistake as it took too much of the focus off of the refugee issues that we originally intended to explore. This wasn’t a great choice, especially since we were unable to cast anyone for the tribe so we were decided to not show them on screen, which I think lessened the audience engagement with the story being unable to assess the threat to the characters. That being said, I am happy with the end result that we achieved.

This project itself definitely had a slow start, as it was apparent to me that my group and I weren’t very comfortable with each other, in the sense that we had many ideas but we were reluctant to voice our opinions or commit to any of them. This ultimately led us to divert from our original concept to pursue a ‘cannibal island’ story and allowed us to overlook the original themes that this concept was based around; of refugees and dystopian issues in the media and the government of the current day leading into the future. Fortunately the feedback from our pitch set us back on the right course. I am now happy with where our end project has gone, but I have learned to speak my mind more in times of group uncertainty, and to always refer back to the key themes of the project.

Assignment 3-3 SUBTERFUGE

As we are approaching our deadline it is becoming a bit concerning that we haven’t started filming until now, but thankfully our filming schedule assured us that we would have enough time to film everything and edit with time to spare.
This hasn’t been without setbacks though; as we weren’t able to finish filming everything we wanted to on the first day and had to schedule another day to film. However the second day of filming still gives us plenty of time to edit before our final deadline.
Also, casting has again been an issue as even though minimal actors have been required for our project, we have struggled to find actors for the few supporting roles we do have. However we do have some people who have agreed to act for us so thankfully these problems are in the process of being solved.

Assignment 3-2 SUBTERFUGE

We have agreed on our concept and written out an in-world timeline of the events of our story, in which news reports and constant reminders that the characters are being watched by the government serve the purpose of diverting the focus away from the native tribe, while still keeping it as the most immediate threat for the characters, which I think balances out well. However writing the script has brought up issues regarding casting, as our minimal casting causes us to think more conservatively about how some scenes will play out. We have to think about how we can imply that there are more people in the story than there actually are, which has proven to be quite difficult. However it is looking up and we as a group are able to agree on most ideas

Assignment 3-1 SUBTERFUGE

Following our concept pitch, we’ve had, and still have many details of our concept to iron out before we can start shooting our project. Firstly, our concept has had to go through some changes as we have spent much time trying to figure out how we can emphasise the significance of government control in our story rather than the native tribe, in order to focus on the themes of refugees instead of mere survivability.
We have been discussing our production roles for the shoot and we were able to agree on where each other’s strengths lie. Being one of the only people in the group with experience writing scripts this task fell to me, but I am helping out as well with other areas such as filming and acting as well where I can. We’re a bit behind schedule as finalizing the concept needs to happen before I can write the script, but since we have planned a timeline of deadlines are still able to catch up.

Assignment 2: Reflection

This assignment was very eye opening not only for myself, but for my group as well. It was apparent that many of us, myself included, had never really pitched an idea like this before so getting our initial format in order as well as knowing how to speak were the foremost challenges that we had to overcome. Another obstacle early on was the script, as for our rehearsal pitch in class we were very unprepared since we were unsure about what was required. In the end, the main things we needed to work on were knowing what we needed to say, making sure we sounded persuasive, making it interesting and practicing what we were going to say so we could hold more of a ‘conversation’ rather than a slide presentation (some positive feedback from our rehearsal that we wanted to incorporate into our pitch was to leave out slides and just talk). This being said, we still wanted to add images to get across our point more clearly, however this worked not as well as I’d hoped.

 

The feedback that we got was extremely interesting and proved to provoke thought amongst our group, enough to decide to change our concept. Due to initial concerns of portraying refugees as monsters, we agreed to focus more on government control, however the board made us realise many different aspects of portraying government control that we didn’t realise. For instance, since Australians are now the refugees, we might need actors of different ethnicities to play the controlling government or reporters. We also realised that we needed to define our characters further, and reconsider the overall objective of our survivors, and how the ‘cannibals’ played a part in the government manipulation. Altogether, the pitch not only helped to cement our concept, but it also gave us enough insight into areas where we could improve and flesh out to make it better.

Here is our proof of concept:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOmXuzYbZZg&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR23nMKZBEPmbGPS98OhyUfSnkeOUzNybWi2ph_VPCnMJzWVK_7HsftKujU

Week 6 Comparison Shots

The shot that I was aiming to emulate was a frame from the film ‘Buster Scruggs’ of three people bunched together, sitting side by side in a carriage. It feels very claustrophobic, and I tried to put that in the clip that I shot in class. What I took away from this experiment was that it takes more than a frame and pointing the camera similarly to recreate a shot. A shot is composed of framing, but also lighting, costuming, setting, sound and script. A good scene has all of those things performing equally to make a shot happen; more than just the camera.

Attached are screenshots of the shot I took vs the shot I emulated.

Week 5: Summary

I found this week’s exercise really interesting as it was fun to think of possible outcomes of modern-day problems and issues. Since I usually take the train to university every day, I decided to base my concept off of public transport, and the significance it has on modern society. I wanted to explore ideas of our reliance on high-speed travel and what consequences could occur if it just stopped one day. I tried to implement some comedy in the summary to highlight the absurdness of the scenario and to bring something new to an ‘end of the world’ story, to which I think I had varying success.

Summary Concept:

A woman is waiting impatiently for a train on an empty platform, annoyed that she will be late for work. It appears that the world is falling apart around her: houses are on fire, cars are crashed on the side of the road, the streets are empty of people and there are explosions far off in the distance, but all she seems concerned about is not being late, as she slowly makes her journey to get to work on time. This is a dark comedy surrounding society’s reliance on systems and technology in place that helps us run coherently; people slaving away as cogs in a machine whose lives revolve around a meagre contribution to society, and what would happen if everything stopped running.

Week 3-4 Sketch

The concept for this sketch from which we planned and wrote out the week before was a culmination of our ideas to portray a distopian world as appears through a moment of foresight from one of our characters, however we did run into some hiccups in filming that may have hindered the portrayal of our full idea.

Unfortunately due to budget, time  and location restraints, we couldn’t put together a setting for this vision of a distopian world. We also had few actors on hand to fill up a classroom, and only a phone to film on. However, we managed to overcome these difficulties with tight shots, tight editing and a more ambiguous approach to the vision scene. Overall, I view it as a positive outcome as I think the sketch follows a coherent storyline and gets across our idea.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1MG93J1ezlvhWzUIwT_-Rj8eAI6FIHL9d

Week 1 Sketch

The concept of this trailer was born from my group’s in-class discussion surrounding possible consequences or escalations of modern issues regarding race and immigration.

My two group mates and I discussed these issues in regards to possible extreme consequences that might occur after 10 years, and 20 years into the future. Possible consequences that were mentioned includes racial wars, extreme segregation, class divides, controlled areas of inhabitants of different ethnicity, even bans on different types of food. This concept was discussed with the intent of having serious implications towards the future, until the prospect of Pauline Hanson submitting Australia under a dictatorship by the ‘One Nation’ party did we consider the humorous and absurdist potential of our new world.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XYC09vS-CXGNlJKt40leDEDfaKsn2hO9/view?usp=sharing

Attentive Interaction- Reflection

This project has been a huge learning experience for both myself and my group mates Gigi and Matt, and the ideas and concepts we’ve explored have given us valuable skills and a deeper understanding of online screen content. During this project we wanted to expand on the ideas of boredom, attentiveness and engagement through the concept of the ‘attractiveness’ of social media by developing a series of videos that test user’s attention span and level of engagement.

This project displayed formal qualities of online content such as variability since it was enclosed within itself, where no context or prior knowledge is needed to experience the project. However, the video and the subsequent quiz that followed wasn’t exactly modular since it was set up as one video, but it also created a very linear experience, which helped serve the purpose of our experiment and in drawing accurate results. The idea at the start of formulating the concept was to set up the series of videos in a social media like format where users could scroll through their feed and select content to view, however along the development process that concept was lost due to impracticality and the lack of our ability to make it happen. However we believe that the current format where the singular video is followed by a quiz is able to better explore the ideas that we want to share with our audience, while retaining a similar level of audience interaction and engagement.

During this project i have learnt many things relating to the aspects of online screen production and how it differs from traditional screen production. speaking from my experience making this project, in the case of online screen-making the focus is more on the ideas raised behind the footage, rather than the footage itself. Where traditional film making revolves around what the final product is going to look like, I’ve learnt that when making content that is fixated on an online platform, filming what you see and what happens around you without necessarily directly relating to the finished video has its merits. Throughout the semester we have been encouraged to just film; to gather random bits of footage, collate them in post-production, find correlations and patterns within them and then develop ideas and concepts from there, which thus far has proven to be an interesting but effective way of gathering footage and content and has been a tactic that we employed in the making of this project.

In completing this project it has allowed me to reflect on myself at the start of the course, where I knew little about online screen making, and the concepts raised in class. Looking back at some of the questions that were raised of us and by us, I think I have a better idea of the nature of the online space that we can contribute to, and take ideas away from. Comparing our project to the ideas raised of us, I am able to draw conclusions of some of them.

“How can we make engaging online content?”

This is a question that has bugged me, my group and many others in my position as well as we want our work to be interesting, but trends and quality content seemingly pop up at random at different times. It’s difficult to know what people will engage with and how, and I’ve played with the idea that if the content is interactive, and encourages the user to contribute to what they are experiencing, it will be engaging. However now I think that while this aspect helps in creating engaging content, it is not limited to this. Interactive content can improve the level of engagement in a video or project, but at the end of the day a creator should create something they can engage with and find interesting, and in turn someone will want to engage with that in the future as well.

“What are the limits of what we can do online?”

Everyone is different, and ideas can come from a near infinite number of sources, but I feel like there are some limits for what is possible online. The internet is a culmination of billions of ideas developed by millions of people, and the themes and concepts developed globally is immense, and will continue to grow exponentially in the future however there are always constraints. When developing our project, we had an idea to make something, but it was a very sophisticated idea and none of us had the skills to pull it off, so we had to compromise and create something smaller. Constraints can come in many various forms, like lack of software, skills, ideas or opportunities, but the things that people can accomplish while working with, against or around these obstacles will often turn out for the better. The challenges presented to us when creating are there to prove to us that if we can overcome them, we are capable of making something truly magnificent.

Although I said that i can draw these conclusions from what I’ve learnt, I highly doubt that these definitions are final. The internet is a constantly growing and changing organism made up of the ideas of millions of users, and with these traits of this online sandbox, I can only assume that my interpretation and perspective of such a space will grow and change with it as I experience more and more content that is created here.