WOMEN BESIDE THE SCREEN: ASSIGNMENT #1 (15%) – Prompt #3: Text (400 words)

Uncategorized, WOMEN BESIDE THE SCREEN

Axel Grigor’s 2017 non-fiction film, Jill Bilcock: Dancing The Invisible, is a documentary that focuses in on the life and career of Academy Award nominated, Australian film editor Jill Bilcock. Bilcock has worked on some of the most renowned films in cinema history, including Baz Luhrmann’s 1996 BAFTA award winning adaption, William Shakespeare’s Romeo + Juliet. 

Grigor gives the viewers a rather unique and refreshing style of editing in this film, utilising a lot of archived pieces of work, rather than using his own filmed content; yet makes it something of his own, creating a new piece of work, with it’s own new meaning that allows the audience to feel like they are well and truly being invited into the inner workings of Bilcocks life. Making use of exclusively shots of Bilcock editing at her desk, snippets of interviews with herself and other people of interest that relate to the storyline, then layering over green screen and pieced together between examples of Bilcocks work.

This in an interesting way of turning what could have been a simple interview into an entire film production. Grigor has effectively taken what could have been a simple interview, just using the footage of Bilcock alone, and edited down to 3-5 minutes, and turned it into a whole entire profile of the subject – highlighting her entire career, and injecting the interview into that.

Grigor makes use of these repititive shots, showing that he had limited footage of the subject to work with. However, the way Grigor chose to piece it together changed the dynamic of it completely. Zoning into her hands, her work space, and the project she is working on, with these repititive shots then being laid over green screen, gives the audience the sense that Bilcock is always working away at a project – even when she is in the middle of being the subject of another creatives project. This matches the narrative of the film perfectly, as we are being told this story of this woman who burst into the scene and hasn’t slowed down, or stopped, since. This is the perfect example that shows how Grigor’s unique editing style is effective in connecting with his audience and inviting them into the inner workings of the subjects life. Pairing this with the facts about Bilcocks career, and interviews with those in the industry that have worked with her, makes Grigor successful in his endevours to create a high standard documentary on a person, and is just a fantastic example of a non-fiction film.

WOMEN BESIDE THE SCREEN: ASSIGNMENT #1 (15%) – Prompt #2: Text (400 words)

WOMEN BESIDE THE SCREEN

My strategy for interviewing industry professionals is always the same…To research the interviewee in depth, in order to find tailored questions for them, that will always have (or should, given the interviewee answers them promptly) open-ended answers, in order to generate a huge conversation that will (with hope) unlock some hidden truths about the interviewee. The questions I’d choose to ask in order to achieve this, and why, would be the following:

Talk me through your journey in getting to where it is you are today?

  • I believe this is the perfect opening to an interview, guiding the interviewee into opening up the interview, and into opening up themselves, and beginning to generate the conversation.

We know how unfortinately hard it is for women to cut through this male dominated industry, after seeing the statistics that came out of the latest Screen Australia reports… How was your experience in cutting through all of this and getting to where you are? Is there any advice you might have for young women who are also aspiring for this kind of career?

  • As a young female that’s aspiring in the media industry, this is something that I believe is important to ask, as it’s something that most young females like myself are wanting to hear more about.

What made you pursue this career? What was the defining moment for you, when you knew that it was what you wanted?

  • I feel like many creatives do many different things before finding their one true niche within the media industry. With that being said, I’d be interested to hear about the different things that they did before they fell into where they are now.

Do you have any creative inspirations? If so, do you believe they may have helped to shape your creative style in anyway?

  • I find this is an important question to ask to learn more about a creatives style of production. Usually people are influenced by something, and I would like to know what inspires the creative to do what they do.

What piece of work of yours are you the most proud of? Why?

  • I always love to learn about which piece of work is a creatives most favourite and why.

If you could go back and re-work any of your finished projects, which would it be, and why?

  • I find it’s always of interest to learn about whether or not the creative is fully satisfied with the end result, and if there were potentially other ways the end product could’ve gone. Aside from this, I personally always feel like I’m never fully satisfied with any piece of work, and there’s always ways it could be worked on. The possibilities are limitless with creative pieces of work. With this being said, I’d love to know if this is something that the creative in question would be willing to open up about, and what would could potentially come out of this.

 

SCREEN LAB: Assignment#4 – ACMI Exhibition Project: Video work & Individual Written Reflection

SCREEN LAB

WEEKLY REFLECTION BLOG POST LINKS:

WEEK 8: https://www.mediafactory.org.au/jessie-caesar/2020/09/16/screen-lab-assignment-4-week-eight-reflection/

WEEK 9: https://www.mediafactory.org.au/jessie-caesar/2020/09/24/screen-lab-assignment-4-week-nine-reflection/

WEEK 10: https://www.mediafactory.org.au/jessie-caesar/2020/10/03/screen-lab-assignment-4-week-ten-reflection/

WEEK 11: https://www.mediafactory.org.au/jessie-caesar/2020/10/11/screen-lab-assignment-4-week-eleven-reflection/

WEEK 12: https://www.mediafactory.org.au/jessie-caesar/2020/10/13/screen-lab-assignment-4-week-twelve-reflection/

VIMEO LINK TO EDIT OF VIDEO:

https://vimeo.com/mediafactoryrmit/review/468468499/3477f65e51?fbclid=IwAR2X1vqzh_4PV0IiiwtpwXz8FDau-D13E0XowJ6qrLaXAVeqN4Mgt9k4AO8

REFLECTION:

“Your goal must be a good story well told” Robert McKee (2005)…

… This was a quote that was first given to us when we first began the studio, as something to inspire us along the way. This became my goal for the entire studio, to tell a good story, and well. This was, of course, along with aiming to effectively explore and engage with the studio prompt of What possible aesthetic styles, development approaches and other parameters might shape the production of short- form educational videos about complex screen media concepts and processes? The assignments we were given along the way, worked exceptionally towards working towards this goal. We were tasked to make a series of personal videos across the year, before working up to our final big assignment – which was to prepare an educational short-form video for ACMI. These videos that we were tasked to make in assignments one and two, all required us to follow strict perimeters and timelines, in order to prepare us for the work that we would do for ACMI. ACMI (The Australian Centre for the Moving Image), at Federation Square, Melbourne, is Australia’s national museum of film, video games, digital culture and art. Given that ACMI is such a highly revered organisation, it was of much importance to us to be able to follow the timeline and perimeters given to us by them to the absolute best of our abilities. So, assignments one and two, were so helpful to me in order to prepare myself for what ACMI was expecting from us at the end of the semester. Being a part of Screen Lab, this semester, was an incredible experience, and I have walked away with it, with a much better understanding of what to expect when I finally begin to work in the media industry. I was able to learn to effectively work to tight timelines, and produce something that I was both proud of, and extremely satisfied with, all while working within the firm perimeters. I’m extremely excited to be a part of the exhibition at ACMI, as it’s something I can put on my portfolio, and truly be proud of. Despite the fact that we were confined to the spaces of our homes to learn, and didn’t have access to RMIT facilities, equipment, and didn’t even have face-to-face classes – I truly feel that the staffing team did an incredible job at keeping engagement and learning levels high, and I felt like I spent the entire semester well engaged with both my teacher and classmates – Even walking away from the studio with a few new friends. Who would’ve thought that could be possible in these times? It’s a testament to how well the studio was run, and how hard our teacher had worked to making us feel connected as possible in the face of this unprecedented moment in history.

Producing assignment four was trying, to say the least. I prefer to work on my own, but it would naïve for me to think that I will ever work alone in the real media industry, ever. Because of this reality, I really wanted to push myself this time around to be a part of a group, and learn to break down this anxiety I feel towards relinquishing control to other people, and learn to work with people to make my work better and easier to execute. I worked with Sarah Jackson-Harris, Jude Islip and Sherly Lim. I’m glad I chose to do this, as I felt overwhelmed with the pressure of all the assignments towards the end of the semester in all my classes, and couldn’t even begin to image how I would have coped trying to produce the assignment on my own. We began by adding each other on social media to create a group chat so we could have continuous contact with one another, and organise meeting together over zoom conference – Which would become our go to, to call and speak face-to-face. We were tasked to pick a prompt, from the set of prompts that were given to us by ACMI’s Field Carr, and create a concept to present and pitch to the class, Cat and Field. My group decided to go ahead and pick What is a Pepper’s Ghost? (In films but also Space Invaders even Tupac Hologram). We were extremely excited by this idea of creating a hologram, immediately thinking of all the creative possibilities there were to explore this prompt. After it had been taken it to class discussion to ensure everyone got their fair choice, and we had all decided our prompts, it was time to begin to work on our concepts.

We jumped into basically straight away, organising a call to work out our prompt after we had all finalised our choices. Our ideas were big, especially given all the restrictions surrounding the stage four covid-19 pandemic lockdowns in metropolitan Melbourne, but we were going to attempt to execute them anyway. Our idea was to make our very own Pepper’s Ghost sets, and record ourselves presenting the idea of the Pepper’s Ghost, while simultaneously showing how the Pepper’s Ghost works. We commenced our research on how this would be done, and I created a bunch of templates for sets to map out how to do it, and what we would need. We also created a presentation together on Google Docs, where we mapped out this research and concept idea. We pitched this presentation to the class, Cat and Field, and watched everyone else’s presentations for their concepts and ideas. I really enjoyed Beatrice, Georgia and Tiani’s presentation for the prompt Breaking the fourth wall. The feedback I had for them was the following: “presentation, looks fantastic. I can get a great idea of what you’re looking to do and you have good background information. 2. when you say reenacting, will this be you guys playing out a scene from an actual film or writing your own sort of script out with your own characters? 3. No suggestions really, just interested in seeing how you’re intending to incorporate live action with archive footage”.

Now we had nailed out our concepts, it was time to get cracking on producing our films. Our first hurdle was finding the stuff for it while all non-essential services were closed. We had to order a bunch of stuff from both Officeworks, and Bulk Acrylics, including black foam board, hot glue gun and glue sticks, acrylic sheets of glass and a crafting knife.

Once I had all these items, I was able to cut up the foam boards into a set for the Henry Dircks inspired small scale set, glue it together with the hot glue gun, and slide the sheet of acrylic in to create the holographic effect, once we place lights into it. We see this set in the video with the Magic School Bus and the Tupac Shakur example. I then began to create the John Henry Pepper inspired set, employing my mother to cut up the acrylic sheet into smaller pieces, which involved scoring and snapping with tools that I didn’t know how to use. Once she had cut the acrylic up into smaller triangles, I was able to stick them together with clear tape to hold it together and make the projection pyramid we see in the rest of the video. Once these were done, we were able to begin to move onto the filming phase.

The first phase of filming involved me writing up a script out of the information that was on the concept presentation. This would be to present in front of my green screen at home, and used to project me into these sets as holograms. We though filming the presentation on a green screen background would allow us to have more to work with. I proved to make a few mistakes during this process, and ended up having to cut down about 20 minutes’ worth of footage before getting a solid cut where I was happy with my presentation. Then I passed the footage on to Sarah, who was able to colour correct the green to a bright enough colour to Ultra Key it to a nice clean black. This we were then able to play with to put in the projection pyramid, as well as at the tail end of the video with green screen footage behind me.

After doing this process, we were then able to move into stage two of filming, which would be filming myself in these sets, as well as filming our examples that we were speaking about in the film on these sets. We originally were hoping that the restrictions would ease, so we were able to pass along the set to Sherly to film with her Sony A7. This didn’t end up happening, so I resorted to filming a majority of it on my Nikon D3000 on an 18-55mm lens. While I was able to get nice clean shots of the sets at a mid-range, I wasn’t able to capture a clear shot close up. This resulted in Jude creating his own projection pyramid out of clear CD cases, and passing it on to Sherly to refilm these close-ups, which we see in in the final cut. Sherly also took the beautiful shots at the beginning of the butterflies with her A7. So, in the end, it was a combined effort between myself and Sherly filming.

Editing began with Sherly, who put together our first rough cut we presented to Cat and Field. Then, she passed it on to myself, who put together the final cut. I then passed it back to Sherly to colour correct, play with the audio, as well as add in the Ken Burns effect we see of John Henry pepper and Henry Dircks, as this was something that was easier for her to achieve in her editing software – which is different to what I work on, Adobe Premiere Pro. She had already added this effect in in the rough cut, so I had to export my final to her to add these in for the sake of continuity. We then showed out rough cut in class, and received some feedback for changes from Cat, which Sarah edited and fixed up. After this was done, this was the final cut that we submitted for assignment four, and to ACMI.   

While collaboration was trying, especially considering I originally didn’t want to at all, but I’m glad that I did. Working as a team was something that taught me a lot of lessons about the trials and tribulations of working with other people. The conflicts and tensions that arise, the creative differences that occur, and all of the other curveballs in between – It was ultimately, an extremely valuable learning lesson for me, and I’m glad that I was a part of creating this work for ACMI and successfully passing Screen Lab with my team.

SCREEN LAB: ASSIGNMENT #4 – WEEK TWELVE REFLECTION

SCREEN LAB

The key learning we did this week was discussing the final touches again for assignment four, as well as discussing what we would need to be doing for assignments five parts one and two. We went over ensuring that we are including all the correct ACMI logo and fonts that we are required to use as a constraint. We discussed how for assignments five part a would be posting our films to the Screen Lab studio website (but also as a part of assignment four) for our exhibition, that would include:

  • a title, a short summary of your work, its process and what you got out of it and;
  • an embedded link to the final work housed on the MediaFactory Vimeo account
  • a featured image of the final work

The main conceptual and main media making elements we discussed were all in relation to our rough cuts of our ACMI short educational films for assignment four – uploading all of our rough cuts to the one drive to show both Cat and the class, in order to get some constructive criticism, and make any final changes before the due date this coming Friday (October 16th). For our group, we discussed how we had to be at 25 fps and were only currently at 23fps, how we had to work on making the audio clearer, and how there were two minor bits that were out of sync. We fixed these up, before uploading them to Vimeo.

SCREEN LAB: ASSIGNMENT #4 – WEEK ELEVEN REFLECTION

SCREEN LAB

The key learning and conceptual elements we discussed this week was all in relation to the final touch perimeters, that ACMI require and are asking us to abide by, in attempts to get organised and ready to prepare and handing in our final cuts for Assignment #4.

The main media making elements we discussed were what these perimeters were, and how we should execute them. The first perimeter is that we are to keep it to 2:30mins. This is a bit of an issue for us, and the tightest we could get it to is around the 2:50 mark. We are discussing ways we may be able to tackle this issue now. The second, and most important perimeter, is to ensure we are downloading and using the correct title fonts, and new ACMI logo that should be used in the final cut. Because this is a public blog, and these fonts/logos are currently confidential, I cannot name them here. We were given these fonts/logos to use via email and CANVAS portal from Cat and Field, along with a PDF briefing us on how we should use these titles from ACMI, and instructions on how to use them from Cat.

SCREEN LAB: ASSIGNMENT #4 – WEEK TEN REFLECTION

SCREEN LAB

The key learning we did this week was all in relation to Assignment Four, and all the requirements we have to meet in the next week. Cat told us we are expecting Field Carr in class next Tuesday – meaning we will need a rough cut put together by then.

The main conceptual elements we discussed were in relation to how we were going to make all of these requirements happen. This was going to be a big process for my group, as there are so many elements to the film, that all require to be made in seperate steps before we get to film the final piece. For our concept, we wished to make a real Pepper’s Ghost set and film myself presenting so we could place it in the set – so we are not only explaining the Pepper’s Ghost, but also showing an example of it.

The main media making element of this week was the execution of all of this. It began with us ordering acrylic sheets, foam board, hot glue gun/glue sticks and clear tape online, as nothing is open due to stage four restrictions in Victoria. This meant we had to wait it out till it came – luckily for us, however, it came in a very fast two days. Making the sets required a lot of trial and error. In total I made about 6 mock up pyramids before cutting into the acrylic sheet, which ended up being a process of scoring and snapping a net that I had designed up to make the pyramid. Then we trialed gluing it with plastic glue, which totally failed. It melted the acrylic, making it all cloudy and messy – resulting in having to make it again and using the clear tape instead to piece it together. Then, I had to film myself presenting for the set. I did this on a green screen background, and spent a lot of time colour correcting and cutting down the footage, so I was able to Ultrakey it to the best of my abilities. I also chose to record the audio with my Blue Yeti X mic, and sync it up with the audio. This I had some troubles with, as well as syncing up the audio, so I uploaded it to our groups OneDrive for Sarah to go over and cut and correct further. Once we did this, we were able to execute a first shoot of the set, which proved to be difficult due to having to film the hologram on an iPad and in the dark. I shot it on my NikonD3200 and took some shots on my CanonEOS300d. I was able to pass this on to Sherly, who made it into a rough edit for Cat, Field and the class to see on Tuesday.

SCREENING POLITICS AND ECONOMIES: WEEK NINE REFLECTION

SCREENING POLITICS & ECONOMIES

When Peter Weir’s Gallipoli (1981) was shown to me, I was a mere five year old girl, watching for two important reasons. The first being that I am a half-caste Maori, with a Maori father and an Australian mother, and roots connecting back to the ANZACs and the tragic unfolding that happened in Gallipoli in 1915. The second being, because my grandmother Merekaraka Tipoki-Caesar played a small, but identifiable role in the film. A madam in Cairo, telling Frank (Mel Gibson), Jack (Bill Kerr), Snowy (David Argue) and Billy (Robert Grubb) that her women were clear of sexually transmitted diseases as they are passing through, about to pay for sexual acts the night before they are sent out to battle. Filmed in Adelaide, my Grandmother made friends with Peter Weir, and originally took her dance group of young Maori women to be extras in this scene – but upon arrival, Weir had decided he was to place her in the scene. A fun fact – My Uncle Tane (Caesar), was also taken to set, where he would also be in this scene and Weir would ask him and some of the young Maori men to perform a Haka, which he filmed and intended to place in the film. It was later cut. Gallipoli (1981), not only helped form my sense of national identity, but Australia’s as a whole – as it launches the Australian film industry to whole new heights, putting Australia on the map as serious filmmakers.

“Film plays a crucial role in the formation of national identity, and an equally important part in providing interpretations of history… Nations often identify themselves by glorifying key moments in their history, and film and television interpretations then bring these events to life in a more immediate way than any other form of communication. Peter Weir’s Gallipoli is a film about an historical event that played a key role in shaping Australia’s perception of itself, and its qualities, as a nation. To Australian and world audiences, the film took on an added significance for it also marked the coming-of-age of the Australian film industry. Few moments of Australian history had ever been put on film before, and so Gallipoli brought to world audiences an Australia shaped by an Australian cast and crew (Connelly, M., 2007, pp. 41).”

The personal family connection to the film aside, it is undeniable that Gallipoli helped to shape not only my sense of national identity, but help Australia and it’s people as a whole, forming this sense of national identity through the film – as we reflect on what was a reality for our people in 1915.

CITATIONS

  • Gallipoli, V.H.S., 1981. directed by Peter Weir. Sydney: Roadshow.
  • Connelly, M., 2007. Gallipoli (1981): ‘A Poignant Search for National Identity’. In The New Film History (pp. 41-54). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

SCREEN LAB: ASSIGNMENT #4 – WEEK NINE REFLECTION

SCREEN LAB

The key learning we did this week was all in relation to Assignment #4. This week we presented our Assignment #4 concepts to ACMI industry professional Field Carr, and RMIT Lecturer and industry professional Alan Nguyen. My group were presenting our concept on Peppers Ghost, to which we had really positive response from the both of them. The main conceptual elements we discussed were in relation to our concept, and how we were going to make it work. This included explaining how we would build our Pepper’s Ghost set and attempt to create our own Pepper’s Ghost hologram of myself – presenting on the history and other examples of Pepper’s Ghost. We explained how we would be using plexi-glass and foam board to create our own smaller-scale Pepper’s Ghost set to try one theory, and also a projection pyramid out of the plexi-glass to place on an iPad to test another theory. We plan to see which of the pair works best, or even if we can, incorporate both of the ways Pepper’s Ghost can be created.

The main media making element we discussed was how we would be moving towards the production of Assignment #4. This included how we would begin working towards our rough-cuts now. For us, this is through creating these sets and beginning the filming of me on a green screen, so we can move towards editing the footage to work within our sets. We intend on working on this immediately.

SCREEN LAB: ASSIGNMENT #4 – WEEK EIGHT REFLECTION

SCREEN LAB

The key learning we did this week was in relation to preparation for assignment four. This was through doing research and examination of previous ACMI examples, and what factors we could take from these in order to help conceptualise our ideas for our ACMI films for assignment four. We discussed how it should be first and foremost, highly educational, but still engaging and entertaining. We discussed how Field Carr from ACMI would provide further feedback on how we can do this in Week nine.

The main conceptual elements we discussed were about how we can obtain funding for feature films through Screen Australia, and all the guidelines that come with applying for funding for a film (which can be found at: https://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/funding-and-support/feature-films/development/generate). This is especially useful for us, as students, and as as budding filmmakers.

The main media making element we discussed this week was how we would execute both our practice presentation this week, and the pitch presentations we will be having in class in the following week to Field Carr and another guest. This weeks practise run could be made into pdfs or powerpoint slides to show an example of our idea, or alternatively can be basic rough cut or basic elevator pitches at this stage. We should be continuing our assignment four pre-production now, through doing research, scripts, shot-lists and storyboards – which from Week eight onwards, will be included in our assignment four reflections. Come Week nine, we should have a much further refined concept – with a com-partnering powerpoint presentation and potentially a rough cut or test run to show the class and guests.

SCREENING POLITICS AND ECONOMIES: WEEK EIGHT REFLECTION (SCREENING MIGRATION AND RACISM)

SCREENING POLITICS & ECONOMIES

Lee Tamahori’s 1994 Once Were Warriors was, and still is an international hit. When we think of productions coming out of New Zealand, it’s almost always the topic of conversation. And while it’s an outstanding piece, and an accomplishment for New Zealand, in many respects, garnering international attention, winning the Australian Film Institute Award for Best Foreign Film, and bringing the raw, honest, reality of a large percent of the Maori population to the international forefront – it was, equally, just as much of an embarrassment for Maori people and their culture. “The topic of immigration has implications for states and individuals. How we define ourselves is a matter of identity politics. Our identity is shaped by our birth, our family, and our experiences. Immigration leads to interesting philosophic questions: Are our identities changeable? What is the effect around the world of identity politics? (Sachleben, M., 2014, pp. 138)” This is particularly important, when we discuss Once Were Warriors (1994), as while it tells the story of the average Maori’s struggle, we neglect these questions when analysing it, isolating the the problem as the Maori’s – when in reality the issue is much more than that. These questions within identity politics leading into long conversations of colonialism, with a majority of these issues that affect the Maori stemming from introductions from the Pakeha (white settler) (e.g. Alcohol and alcoholism) that the Maori simply hadn’t faced until colonialism occurred. This showing that “the development of New Zealand cinema (Joyce, H., 2009, pp. 239)”  is “reflective of the disintegration of the utopian dream inherent in the founding settler era… and… their representations of Maori culture are illustrative of Pakeha (white settler) anxieties about Maori/Pakeha relations (Joyce, H., 2009, pp. 239).” 

 

CITATIONS:

  • Once Were Warriors, 1994. [DVD] Lee Tamahori, Auckland, New Zealand: Tandem Press.
  • Sachleben, M., 2014. World politics on screen: Understanding international relations through popular culture. University Press of Kentucky.
  • Joyce, H., 2009. Out from nowhere: Pakeha anxieties in Ngati (Barclay, 1987), Once Were Warriors (Tamahori, 1994) and Whale Rider (Caro, 2002). Studies in Australasian Cinema3(3), pp.239-250.