
Film Link:
BLACKOUT
Reflection:
Working collaboratively on BLACKOUT was overall a really good experience. I was lucky enough to work with a super committed and organised group to produce something we are all happy with. In some of my previous projects, individual roles haven’t been as clear, so having dedicated production positions from the very beginning made a really huge difference to our effectiveness. I found that having someone definitively in charge of the project also helped a lot with keeping the vision clear and ensuring that we all knew what was expected from our roles.
One major drawback of the film, which we were able to address effectively during the editing process, was the performance of our lead actress. During filming it was clear she hadn’t prepared much, if at all for the role, even needing her phone on the desk during the therapy interview scene in order to read her lines. She also struggled to provide the more emotionally intense performance we wanted, even at times disagreeing with directions we attempted to give her. This unfortunately resulted in an increased necessity for creative editing choices to try and generate the desired effect. This involved a couple of moments where we needed to use over the shoulder shots of her dialogue rather than the close-up more emotionally resonant shots that we just couldn’t get, as well as additional layered effects to lean further into the character’s disorientation rather than intense emotion. Our film emulates the wider horror genre’s use of the fear of the past and memory through Eshe’s PTSD inspired experiences (Howell and Green, 2024), which I think heavily relies on a clear performance reflective of the emotional meaning of the featured memories. Although, I think that in watching the film, the flatter and less emotional expressions read as an intentional creative character choice as opposed to something lacking from our work, which it sometimes felt like during post-production. I think that as a team we handled this challenge pretty well, getting the most we could out from what we had and I hope that we all feel as happy with the film as I do.
One thing I might expand on however was our coverage of the protest scene. I think that our planning was really effective in making that scene work within the film, and I might be a little biased, but I wish we could have had more shots of the protest signs to more directly signify the social and political intentions of the film. I was really happy with how the signs look, as my biggest focus during pre-production was getting the signs and messages right in accordance with the position of our film and the real world signs I was taking inspiration from. To me this reflected the core of the realistic horror we wanted to convey, as Kawin discusses, the presence of ‘real’ in horror connects audiences to the authentic “common experience” of real fear (Kawin, 2012). While our film centres around a fictitious protest, the circumstances and setup stem from real events which elevates our ability to convey horror. We likely would have been able to show slightly more of the signs without major structural changes to the film, but unfortunately our best take for the scene features an extra accidentally holding her sign upside-down in the front row, so we decided to zoom in and focus on the intimate emotional position of Eshe in the scene, rather than the scale of the protest itself. I think this was the correct choice overall but as I said I am biased because I was proud of my signs.
Reflecting on the screening of our final work, the screen brightness became an issue as some of the hallway scenes were too dark to see what was going on. This was very annoying to me at the time as we had played our cuts on various screens in the editing booths and classroom monitors when displaying rough cuts, and this hadn’t been a notable issue. It was particularly frustrating as the audience were unable to see key moments like our shadow hand effect, which I think took away from the atmosphere we intended during those scenes. While I do think that our work was effective in creating our desired psychological vibe, imagining myself as just an audience member while watching our film left me spending more time trying to decipher the darker-than-intended shots rather than remaining immersed.
I do however think that the sound design worked really effectively in the lecture theatre context to create the atmosphere in places where the visuals didn’t meet our goals. Sound in horror has the ability to generate additional unseen meaning and inspire fear by delivering a “heightened physical or physiological jolt to the viewer” (Kattelman, 2022). I think our film demonstrates this effectively, especially in the opening segment’s use of a soundscape to position the audience within the psychological context of our narrative.
Overall, working on BLACKOUT was a really great experience and I am happy with the film we were able to produce.
References:
Howell, A., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2024). Haunted histories and troubled pasts : Twenty-first-century screen horror and the historical imagination. Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
Kattelman, B. (2022). The sound of evil: How the sound design of Hereditary manifests the unseen and triggers fear. Horror Studies, 13(1), 133–148.
Kawin, B. F. (2012). Horror and the Horror Film. Anthem Press.