Week 08: Reflections

Constraints, constraints, constraints. The magical word of the semester.

What we discussed this week was about how formal constraints actually allow creativity. In fact, creativity can’t happen without constraints. For example, in music, there are only certain notes that you can use. And if you decide to write a pop song, there’s a structure you follow.

Image via flickr

Image via flickr

As young media professionals, we need to stop waiting for inspiration, or the lightbulb moment, and just make. We need to realise that we do have things to say and things to make if we can learn to stop, look, listen and notice the world around us. We must release ourselves from thinking we can only do this if we impose our will upon the world. We are so caught up in epistophelia – the obsession with explaining – that we take away all of the magic, poetry, mystery and responsibility as a maker. There’s nothing left. Our work will be didactic and dull if we think each clip has to explain itself. The clips don’t actually matter in themselves, but they matter by virtue of the relations which are formed. This is where meaning happens. Then, we are composing something.

We then spoke about the ‘essay film’, and how these too can be documentaries. Essays are filtered through the thoughts and subjectivity of the person making it – they are not trying to look at the world objectively (or if they are, they’re already failing). Essay films, therefore, invite conversation and dialogue. They invite the viewer to join the filmmaker as they think through and explore something.

Once again, it was drilled into us that our interpretation of a text has no relationship to what the author intended. Context can never be preserved – we read films/television/paintings/books differently over the years as our own experience and worldview changes with our environments. Intent does not survive anything – it’s the easiest thing to break. That’s why we have satire and parody.

We finished by discussing the fact that expression and exploration are tangental and multi-linear in nature. We think that linearity comes first and that multi-linearity is a new thing. It’s actually the other way round: ideas aggregate around each other and always have. This is the way we experience the world, through webs of association. Whereas linearity imposes order, hierarchy, priority. This helped me to clear up a few things which I was wondering about last week. 

(Image via flickr)

 

Week 07: Linear, non-linear, and multi-linear

It’s taken me quite some time to get my head around the concepts of linear vs. non-linear narratives (and non-narratives) throughout the IM1 course. And then there’s multi-linear works, which play off the way that our world is developing to become more and more entangled.
This is very foreign to my way of thinking, and it’s something I want to be able to understand, I just think it might take some grappling with.
Some things that I need to start thinking about are:
  • Chronology
  • Hierarchy
  • Primal order
  • Causality
  • Immersion
  • Memory
  • Flashbacks/flashforwards

What about Godard’s famous quote: “I agree that a film should have a beginning, a middle and an end but not necessarily in that order.” It reminds me of the Latin term in medias res – which translates to ‘in the midst of things’ – which refers to the act of starting in the middle rather than the beginning.

I think Woody Allen’s Annie Hall (1977) is a good starting point for me to think of non-linear film. Or even the more modern Inception (2010) or Eternal Sunshine of a Spotless Mind (2004).

However, I’m not sure that there are any popularised versions of a multi-linear work that I can as easily relate to. Obviously, I have the exposure I’ve had to K-films and interactive documentaries in IM1 so far, but I wonder how it would translate in a more ‘mainstream’ media society.

I asked a few friends of mine, what does multilinear mean to you? Some of the things they said were:

I think it means when many story lines are all going on at the same time.

Another agreed with the above, but went on to say:

I think it’s also when those multiple stories intersect and interact with each other finally. Like in Love Actually or something.

I think that this way of thinking may be too time-based, and instead, how we should conceive of multi-linearity is more akin to ‘multi-tasking’. Essentially, it’s asking the brain to keep track of a few things at once, and possibly retain the information in case you need it later on to help make connections and relations. What do you reckon?

(Image via flickr)