Tagged: media

Open2Study Online Advertising Module 1 notes

  • Evolution of the web:
  • the web simplified what was complicated into a standard protocol
  • 1993 – Tim Berners-Lee – made access of info available to everyone
  • mobile now primary access –> what does this mean then for online advertising?
  • Hyper Text Markup Language
  • Commercialisation of the internet
  • advertisers sought to monetise consumers
  • WIRED magazine – how technology was affecting culture – first web ad for AT&T “Have you ever clicked your mouse right here? You will.”
  • portals, eg netscape
  • opportunities for commercialisation of search
  • online ad banners generate high volumes of interest displayed by high percentages of user click-through rates
  • Digital industry players
  • marketers have more choice than ever in terms of where they can advertise and run their marketing messages
  • digital has exponentially increased choices
  • advertisers have to sift through and ask: where is the best place to spend my money?
  • buyers: agencies primary buyers
  • issue that there is no standard structure for the way advertising is bought and sold
  • sellers:
  • pure play = a media company that has no legacy property (eg TV network, newspaper), it is online only, eg Amazon, Yahoo
  • traditional = eg, print publishers having websites
  • creatives: more interested in allure of TV than small postage-sized ads online
  • technology companies – SEO etc
  • New players and traditional outlets repurposing themselves
  • How digital complements print media
  • magazines with apps with additional content in editorial and advertising – can bring print to life – online enhances print
  • not competing medias but complementing
  • channel isn’t as important as the content
  • not tied to physical product anymore
  • How digital complements broadcast media
  • TV expensive, so video online may be more feasible
  • TiVo etc, fast forwarding ads is a major challenge to industry
  • tablet use in front of TVs offers opportunities for networks to connect with these audiences
  • TV show shareability over social channels
  • ads with Shazam embedded at the bottom for us to use over phones while watching TV
  • Online audience measurement
  • every medium has an agreed standard audience currency, eg TV ratings and viewershio, radio listenership, print readership and circulation
  • difficult for online to settle on a particular standard currency
  • Australia one of the first countries to establish the standard
  • Nielsen had a couple of different methodologies:
  • site centric = based around code to measure activity counting browsers as people – challenges because often more than one person uses a computer, and people often use more than one device
  • based on panel = track activity of panel members – challenge as may under represent
  • every measuring metric has inherent flaws, the importance is that the industry agrees on a methodology
  • Nielsen combined both to create UA – Unique Audience
  • Still not all websites use this system when reporting audience members to agencies/advertisers, may use Google Analytics
  • Digital jargon
  • hits = one of the first measurement metrics on the web
  • outdated and irrelevant
  • it doesn’t mean visitors but the load on the webpage, ie each element that needs to load (this means nothing to advertisers)
  • be confident enough to ask what someone means by hits, eg visitors, pageviews, etc
  • SEO = Search Engine Optimisation
  • updating content, unique content, appropriate keywords, external links
  • things that make search engines things this is a valuable, content-rich site
  • cookies = piece of code that a website uses to determine browsers
  • they are identifiers
  • when sites remember usernames that is because the cookies recognise you

 

 

Future visions

This week’s reading Digital video and Alexandre Astruc’s camera-stylo by Bjørn Sørenssen begins with asking whether “expanded access to digital production means and distribution channels of audiovisual media also imply an enhancement of the democratic potential of these media“. These changes in media production and distribution certainly change the way we think about film: as discussed in the first lecture, film isn’t scarce anymore and this has many implications. We can record on our phones to brainstorm and think through ideas, not necessarily making polished pieces as we may once have considered the use of film. Similarly, a writer can brainstorm on the back of an envelope.

Sørenssen makes an compelling point that it is “always interesting to review old utopian visions, as they remind us of our part in fulfilling or failing to fulfill the expectations of earlier generations“. I found this an amusing sidenote to consider how we have stacked up to Plato’s Republic or whether we will measure up to Star Trek.

Utopia – sourced from michaelromkey.typepad.com

Sørenssen notes Astruc’s thinking that Descartes’ philosophy “would today be of such a kind that only the cinema could express it satisfactorily“. Are there ideas that can only be expressed through certain mediums? Undoubtedly there are times when I am lost for words trying to explain something, maybe it could be better expressed through film. What about the combination of words and image – does film in that way lend itself to better understanding simply due to the combination of factors?

Similarly, how does expression through art come into play? Image sourced aestheticamagazine.com

Sørenssen mentions the personal computer and its importance on how we view content; similarly the mobile phone. What does this mean for content creators and how is it different to imagining creating for a big cinema screen? More personal = more intimacy?

Habermas is quoted within the article lamenting that the “use of the Internet has both broadened and fragmented the contexts of communication”. The Internet recently celebrated 25 years of the web, and in a commemorative article on the Irish Times Davin O’Dwyer notes the Internet ” has revolutionised communication to the point where most people can publish and disseminate information within seconds. This unhindered ability to communicate and disseminate information has also led to powerful citizen-driven movements, such as the Arab Spring in 2010″.

We no longer have to go into an office to work or go to the library to find information. What impact is this having on our culture? And what about implications surrounding our privacy?

Astruc’s “vision of the future author who writes using a camera instead of a pen” certainly opens up new possibilities for expression through audio-visual mediums, however I have to edit this vision for myself as I can’t see a future without written memoirs: that authors write using a camera and a pen.

What is your canvas for expression? Image sourced from guestonplanet.blogspot.com.au

Hubs

Notes from week nine symposium and tutorial

  1. The center of our own network/our relationship to the network vs the network actually having a centre
  2. Networks are dynamic – always growing
  3. ‘Dynamic’ as a way of thinking and learning: open to change, admitting when we’re wrong – this is not a popular way of thinking
  4. Global networks and how cities fit in to this network –> creative industries
  5. Creative knowledge workers
  6. Creative economy
  7. Networks: centralised (hierarchical) vs scalefree?
  8. Heritage media
  9. There’s no centre for the internet – if something goes downs, the rest of the internet won’t go down as in TV or radio or newspapers.
  10. Hubs – defined by how many ties link in and out
  11. The importance of the strength of weak ties – friends don’t get you jobs but acquaintances do
  12. 6 degrees of separation
  13. The internet is not virtual – bandwidth pollution and carbon footprint
  14. Developing countries leapfrogging heritage/industrial media and getting straight to wireless, eg Nokie interface translation
  15. The mechanics of scarcity, eg, retail shelf sapce, TV only having 24 hours of broadcast time a day
  16. Venture capitalism
  17. 80:20 rule
  18. Internet infrastructure is finite