Link of final work:
Mediafactory Vimeo:https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/556115415
Reflection:
In this project, our group focuses on the pollution caused by human beings for the vegetation cover and the climate changes brought by it. The main purpose that we formulated this theme is to project the pollution and climate changes caused by it in people’s daily life onto the screen through the production and practical technologies of media, which have been existing but are not emphasized or have been ignored, so as to arouse the attention of viewers to climate changes and environmental problems. In the work of our group, with the scenes of vegetation as the principal line and people’s daily life as the branch, pollution brought by human behavior to vegetation has been amplified, e.g. garbage pollution, industrial pollution and daily emissions, after shooting and editing those scenes through different methods, the climate changes caused by pollution are finally alternately presented, so as to remotivate the cognition of viewers of climate changes and environmental protection. We hope that viewers could feel the damage and pollution caused by the other role of “human beings” to vegetation as well as the final result of climate changes caused by such pollution immersively from the perspective of the parties instead of onlookers when appreciating this work.
Through rethinking of our work based on details, I summarize the best advantage of it as the selection and use of shooting and audio track. The aspect of shooting is reflected on the completely detailed shooting of materials and frames, which has been closely integrated with the theme. Demos, Scott, & Banerjee, S (eds) mentioned in the book that non-linguistic coordination and communication could be realized through the production of non-fiction films. In the frames of the work, our group members have shot various different scenes of plants through extremely close, which have been presented from the perspective of the creeping of insects. A small world of plants is created in the 8-minute work, in which the tiny plants are exactly the lives that might be ignored or hurt by the human behavior of viewers in daily life. Because of the application of diversified materials and frames, I think that we have well presented the concept put forward by Gibson on the screen, that is, there are continuous changes and entry of new elements into the environment, which exist and then disappear. In the constantly changing dynamic, various kinds of plants are performing their own functions in the nature. Before the warning or remindful meaning appears, a good sense of beauty is granted to the work to attract the interest of viewers. In our post-editing, some instability of frame or imperfection of image quality is retained, which highlights the characteristics of those plants. Lam also mentioned in the book that the insufficiency of image quality was a necessary link to reflect the creating environment and appreciation of a work. Therefore, I think that those imperfect images can be connected to the human behavior, nature and pollution contained in our theme, which are also a caution for viewers. The second is the addition of audio track, during recording, our group members represent the rush and stress of people in daily life through the sound of dididi when passing the traffic light, while the sound of ‘didid’ given out by telegraph is used for frame containing human beings’ hazardous behavior, which is different from common background music, instead, it is an urgent and warning sound to appeal to viewers for their emphasis on climate changes. In addition, through my reflection, the most problematic part of our work is the unclear relation among themes. We have not presented the deeper relations of the influence brought by climate changes after the vegetation is damaged, instead, we simply linked to the phenomena caused by climate changes, which is an omission in our work.
During the production process of the work, the most important point that I learnt is to diverge my own thinking and thoroughly change the observing perspective, so as to arouse the attention of viewers to environmental changes. As the role of human beings in the natural ecology, my observing perspective and the things I notice are the same as others of the same kind, while when I need to attract and arouse the same kind of attention through the theme of climate change from the same perspective, I think it a complete change of perspective. In the work, when observing from the perspective of an insect or a reptile, I can see the increasing decrease, perishing and ruination of plants, vegetation becomes a huge object that I can rely on in “my” eyes, while when realizing that it might decrease or even die out because of human behavior, “I” will have a serious sense of constriction, so that I will pay attention to this problem. Then “I” will present the above to human beings from the perspective of insects to pursue the same effect. The switch of observing perspective makes me more creative during the present and future media technology production, so as to produce works more abundantly and appropriately.
Reference
Demos, T., Scott, E. and Banerjee, S., 2021. The Routledge Companion to Contemporary Art, Visual Culture, and Climate Change. Milton: Taylor & Francis Group, pp.139-148.
Gibson.R, 2015. Changescapes – An Introduction,in Changescapes: complexity, mutability, aesthetics. Crawley, Western Australia : UWA Publishing, pp.1-21.
Lam, S., 2015. IT’S ABOUT TIME: SLOW AESTHETICS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOCINEMA AND NATURE CAM VIDEOS. In: S. Lam, ed., Slow Cinema. Edinburgh University Press, pp.207-217.