Yikes

Ok, Dilruk. Thanks for dumping some bastardised Justin Timberlake lyrics on my blog.

I’ll just point out now that he wrote this blog post sitting across from me in a busy, noisy bar on Elizabeth Street at about eleven at night while the very song he’s plagiarised blared obnoxiously in the background. Foreground, whatever. It was very obvious, very noticeable, very annoying. Of course he wrote those words down. And turned them into a joke.

But what does a broken version of ‘Senorita’ have to do with Networked Media, especially this week’s concern of Double-Loop learning and noticing and all that jazz. Easy, the subject here – Justin Timberlake, I’ll assume – is having severe issues noticing that the nice girl’s boyfriend is actually a blind man, and mistaking his lack of focus on her for disinterest, assumes that he doesn’t love her. It’s a pretty simple metaphor for recognising our mistakes, as well as the issue of observation and actually noticing and ‘marking’ the things that we see. Of course, Justin does eventually come to realise his love interest’s love interest is visually impaired, but there is nothing to imply that he has gone about correcting himself further than simply admitting he was wrong. Will he apologise for his assumption? Is it relevant?

We can hope that he has learnt about making snap judgements, but how would double-loop learning help him here? Well, it probably wouldn’t. Noticing something is a difficult skill to pick up, and the assumptions that the singer has made are ones that we could all make instantaneously without actually thinking much, and thus there is little buffer for us to self-correct. That said, is there reason to self-correct our thoughts? Since a song can generally be considered a subjective stream-of-consciousness, a narrative, even, we could take this as simply a thought process, and that the poor blind man did not actually come to hear about Justin’s rudeness. What we think is fine, we could be as racist as anything up in our brains, completely bigotted, egotistic and cruel, but if we are able to filter what comes out of our mouths we might seem like the sweetest guys in the world.

That said, Justin put it in a song which Dilruk defiled (I don’t know why I keep making it sound so negative, it wasn’t that bad for the blog-equivalent of a drunk, late-night text) so there isn’t really much he left in his brain. Maybe, for the sake of Justin and Dilruk, we can conclude that the subject is acknowledging his error and is atoning for it by public admitting it. Maybe. Hopefully, he will prevent himself from making a further arse of himself by learning not to jump to conclusions straight away, though really this is a single-loop learning system. However, in this case is double-loop really worth it? No. No, not at all.

Dilruk Jayasinha is a comedian on Live on Bowen, which airs 8:30 on Friday nights on C31. Tune in!

GOODNIGHT Y’ALL

The Story Behind it all (Well, Most of it)

Since the wonderful Hayman Kent visited my blog a few hours ago I have made some creative decisions. First of all, this subject will most likely be my favourite of the year. Yes, that is a decision I can just make. Networked Media’ll be my favourite because, like Writing Media Texts last semester, I get to write pretty much what I want, how I want. Only, this time I have to keep it a little more professional. Posting while a tad inebriated at 2:00am as I kill time on my nightrider is possibly not the smartest move in that regard, but I am a sophisticated drunk. Anyho, I like controlling a medium and having the prerogative to post all the random <EXPLETIVE DELETED> that I feel like, so long as I keep it relatively proffesh.

Second of all, my spur of the moment idea to force poor Hayman Kent (of Live on Bowen ‘fame’) to post whatever came to mind became an even better idea, when I realised I could demonstrate my ability to read a text.

Should you read Hayman’s confusing post, you’ll find no direct reference to Networked Media, but me – with my almighty mind all full of the unholy need to make irrelevant connections between things – I can sense the almost-psychic bond with briefly shared that led to a deeper semiotic meaning being embedded within her words which leads directly to the subject.

By calling to attention a fact that no one has ever noticed or cared to notice, Hayman is demonstrating humanity’s innate ability to ignore plain ideas even when they are repeatedly presented to them. Networked Media explores this as well, much like Adrian Miles’ poem, by taking advantage of the ‘ocean of ideas’ and being affected by the waves. In this case, the alpaca is a specific idea, a molecule in the ocean, and Hayman is bringing it to the surface in her wavy-ness and rocking the boat, so it would seem.

She furthers the notion of our failure to comprehend plain facts by complicating a simple idea. If all alpacas have long elbow hair, does that make them all members of an ethnic group that stereotypically has long elbow hair? Thusly, would they not be named ‘Fabio’? If we, as people, are so readily able to ignore the obvious, why could we not ignore the obvious fact that alpacas aren’t all Brazilian or whatever? Is it not strange that our knowledge of alpacas brings us to the conclusion that they are simply animals? We forget their elbow hair. We forget their ethnicity. We forget them. They are less than ideas, they are simply passing thoughts. So that is what Hayman is bringing us, an idea from left-of-centre, from deep in the ocean, and she is showing us how unleashing the power of subverting conventional theories and processes is a necessary step in deconstructing not just media, but life and philosophy.

You can catch Hayman Kent on Live on Bowen, Fridays at 8:30pm on C31.

Will out.