Week 13 – My Portfolio Essay

The aim of this studio, Online Video Experiment, was pretty vague to me at first. I thought we would be learning to create videos that were made online, just creating another YouTube video. I can remember my first studio session, an early Monday morning class where I had to drag myself out of bed to get myself ready for the nine-thirty morning class. Seth had explained the studio outline to us and all I could remember it was one confusing mess with the various parts.

 

Looking back at the twelve weeks of five hours weekly sessions, I can proudly say that I definitely learnt plenty – went in with a blank mind (probably the blurriest as well) and came out with more knowledgeable information (but still a blur) about online videos. Two weeks passed and I was still mulling over the question “What is Online Video?” and we had discussions over our case study presentations on what we thought was an online video. This studio is all about experimenting where not making the right decisions are acceptable.

 

PROJECTS

My case study was these group of independent filmmakers, Wong Fu Production, who created a web series, Away We Happened, in collaboration with AT&T. I started breaking down this case study with my set of criterias to evaluate what an online video is. There definitely was not right or wrong answer but I could tell by the way I presented in front of my peers that my analysis might have been a little shallow. It was the third week into this studio session, so I was definitely learning from my mistakes. Seth had asked a set of questions and it began prompting me to keep challenging on analysing my thoughts more. For example, what element in that web series did I like about it? The answer was the interactivity and participation of it. I liked how they allowed the audience to choose the next plot and vote for it. These were the type of analysis this studio was looking for and I failed to bring forward to the table during my presentation. This experience made me learn that there are more to analyse not just the surface and I should sit and give more thought about it before thinking everything is settled.

View: all project ONE posts

 

Project two was a group work. I was one of the last few to find a partner. Seeing as one of my peers, Peter, was doing something on interactivity, I decided to ask him if he could work with me since we were both heading in the same direction. We ended up using his case study of the 89 steps documentary. One of our biggest problem was that we were thinking too far ahead, being creative and trying to produce a video with our own narratives. Clearly we did not understand the criterias of project two. We were supposed to pick out elements from our case study and create something with that element in mind. We chose a difficult theme by using interactivity and participation. It was a challenge but I definitely did not regret choosing this path because it only made me explore more to understand and to learn from the ideas.

View: all project TWO posts

 

Project three was probably the most fun I had in creating the sketches. It was due to the fact that I had a clearer idea of what we were going for. We had narrowed down to using first person perspective and trying it out on a narrative and non-narrative structure. As our probe for project three was about using first person perspective and how it is conveyed through the different video tools and services. We had to make seven sketches and I exhausted every way of editing the clip. It was a long take and I didn’t know if I had to cut them or should I leave it as a long take. The different platforms we used and suddenly an idea came while I was reviewing the films on the YouTube Doubler parallel narrative. In between working on my number of sketches I posted a blog post on my work progress. It was definitely exciting to see it come together. I thoroughly enjoyed this project, learning about narratives and non-narratives, seeing how non-narratives did not work well with the first person perspective and how it failed. It was an experiment nonetheless.

View: all project THREE posts

 

Project four had gave me a panic attack. I was stuck for a period of time and I could not get any ideas from all the little experiments on the past videos, trying to change the timings, reversing the shot and so on. It was stressful and worrying as I could not come up with any ideas while others had a few sketches in mind. Thankfully, after a few feedback sessions (and constant worrying), I managed to pull out a few narrative ideas. It definitely is a work in progress but I can tell it was a good prototype that might start a new style of online video.

View: all project FOUR posts

 

SKETCHING

This has been the center of attention in this entire studio (besides reflections and presentations). Sketching is creating quantity of videos, experimenting and researching on different elements and aspects you picked out from your case study. I agree with this technique of practice-based research. In order to understand that certain technique, you need to reconstruct and recreate that technique. By doing a number of sketches only helps you understand how it was made, why it was used and what it means to the audience. Sketching was a new style of research to me. When I first started, especially my project two, it was a mess.

There are three stages of what I learnt in sketching. The first was simple innovative sketching where we experiment and making new discoveries by large quantity. Meaning, we create more sketches to discover more. Then comes speculative sketching, where you think about the form of the film more than the contents of the film. In a way, giving a simple plot  and work out it’s form. For example, what would happen if I use this plot in a non-narrative style with this online service? (It’s that kind of form). Lastly, the prototyping where you create a proper final prototype of what could be your next online video. These stages were important in discovering the various techniques and styles that went through before coming out with a few (passable) sketches. It makes you reconstruct things you have seen before.

 

PRESENTATION

Speaking up in front of an audience has always been a little terrifying for me. I get the nerves when I go up to speak. When I get nervous, I tend to choke on my words and forget to say the important things which results of not being able to convey my message across properly and the audience fail to understand my concepts. Being up front with another person did calm my nerves, however, that did not stop me from forgetting the important ideas again. As I mentioned during my reflection for Week 5, I failed to time my presentation and because I was so nervous, I did not deliver my speech well and that wasted my time as I went around the bush. Peter had also went out of time, leaving me the last 2 minutes for me to explain my sketches. Seth had mentioned that project one was just the warm up for presenting and I believe the more presentations I made the better. Results were shown as my presentation in Week 8 for the panel of judges for project three was better than I had expected it to be. The practice had definitely paid off because I felt a little less nervous as I delivered my speech well (with the help of my cue cards on my phone).

––

Overall, this studio has shown me a different light on the works of online videos. It was definitely not what I had expected online videos to be as I took for granted the knowledge of online videos are solely based on entertainment when there are many elements to take into consideration and the reasons why it was catered for services online only. This studio had a fair share of theoretical and hands-on learning experience. Practice-based research has proven, to me, the best technique of understanding the piece of work we are experimenting on. I intend on using these techniques in the near future as well. As a media practitioner, this would be the steps I would choose when I want to be more innovative and creative. Just like the video on innovative sketching, having fun and just making a huge quantity of sketches can bring about a new discovery and from there, we will learn from it.

 

Reflection: Week 12b – Present Project FOUR Draft

I was not feeling well so Peter pulled the weight of the presentation (sorry Peter!). I have filmed the draft back in Week 11 on the two-sided conversation. I managed to send to Peter and a few points of problems I came across as I filmed it.

These were my presentation notes:

    • could not do it in a proper room that we had planned out.
    • decided to try a different approach.
    • this is two sided conversations. it clearly shows two sides perspective
    • how to make it more effective though? – i had thought of adding monologues /inside thoughts into the two parts.
    • this was just a practice for having two first person perspective. because the room would be a bigger concept (coz bigger room, duh), walking around more, more actions.
    • it was difficult to repeat the same movements we went through. (as you can see some of the missing hand gestures i n the film) – MY HAND WAS POINTING IN THE FIRST PERSON BUT WHEN ON THE OTHER PERSPECTIVE, MY HAND WAS ON THE TABLE- (that’s about close to a min already)
    • THE GUY’S EYES WERE NOT ON ME FOR A PERIOD OF TIME BUT IN HIS PERSPECTIVE WAS ON ME! (NEED TO WORK ON TIMING AND CUES)
    • for the next sketch, we plan to have the room setting filmed. good enough to be a first prototype. and see how we can improve on it from there.
    • to do that WE NEED TO GET THE TIMING RIGHT, THE ACTIONS REPEATED, AND TRY AGAINNNN… (and maybe a more well thought out script)

Reflection: Week 11b – Camera Put To Action

Shot the “TWO-SIDED CONVERSATION” prototype this week. Thanks to my awesome friend, we did it in a cafe while having lunch. I could say it was terribly difficult and we had to re-take each perspective more than three times at least. The mistakes ranged from moving the camera too slow, not on eye level sometimes and looking at things we weren’t suppose to look at.

A friend of mine told me I should film it on a 35mm lens because that is the actual focal length of our eyes… but… I don’t have a 35mm lens! So I just had to make do with my phone camera. We drank coffee until the levels were not the same anymore! But that was the least of our worries, the most problematic situation was that we were holding the camera with one hand that we could only act out scenes with one hand only. We lack an extra pair of hands or maybe gadgets that could strap the camera to our heads.

 

Reflection: Week 11a – IT CAME TO ME!

IDEAS! BEFORE I FORGET THEM!

Two-sided conversation. – Having two perspectives on the situation. Person A will have thoughts and monologues about having trouble spilling a secret to the Person B. Person B will have a monologue about why Person A is being so jittery and awkward.

Stuck in a room – Having two types of observation. One may be looking around the room from one spot while the other roams and inspects every corner of the room.

 

So, I was having lunch with a friend and we were cracking up on making awkward conversations when an idea hit me. What if someone has a secret to tell the other but he/she is absolutely nervous and afraid that it would hurt the other person. Thus, the awkward confrontations. DONE! Idea number one.

The next day, I was running about going in for house inspections (before I get kicked out of my current lease), I always wondered what my friends and I would be if we were locked up in a room like a sort of “focus group” kind of experiment and it gave me an idea of using my first person perspective experiment as the focus group experiment (I think i just confused myself saying experiment multiple times). Anyways, so I thought two people with different kinds of perspective in observing the space.

VOILA! Now, to get cracking on how the film is going to be shot.

Reflection: Week 10b – Think of Ideas!

My mind became a blank. I was stuck with my sketches. Re-read the probe a thousand times and my creative ideas just got blocked. BLOCKED!

As suggested, I tried playing with the timings and sequence with the past videos I had and find something interesting. I tried parallel reverse timing, fast forwarding, playing at different timings. To my despair, there was nothing interesting or anything that I learnt from it. In other words, EXPERIMENT FAIL.

So, as I write this reflection, I am panicking that I do not have anything to present for discussion for next week…

Reflection: Week 9a – Commencing Project FOUR!

Week 9 was just right after completing Project three and presenting in front of the panel of judges. So the first session was probing us and pushing us into the smaller specifics of our experiment. Not many attended the session because it was self-directed so Peter and I did not get much suggestions from our peers. However, the criticisms we managed to get were constructive and definitely very helpful.

According to Seth, we still do not fully understand the concept of ‘First person perspective’ from the sketches we made in project three. I have been jumping between first person and third person perspective. The sketch was unable to allow the audience to grasp distinctively that it was a first person perspective. After that discussion, we started picking out which sketch interested us the most to get started on our project four. Peter and I chose YouTube Doubler after hearing the judges’ suggestion on using a simple tool like YouTube Doubler to create a complex narrative. Due to our time constraints, Brian and Seth were absolutely right about keeping our experiment simple with a complex narrative.

IMG_3481

After a quick brainstorming with Seth my peers, we have our project four probe!

What happens to linear first person perspective video when it is re-appropriated into a parallel narrative using YouTube Doubler or other tools?

What Seth had mentioned during the discussion had been on point. I had double checked and watched through my previous sketches and tried to pinpoint the problem. What I found out was that I was aimlessly walking around the streets that I did not bother with people walking in front of me that it did, indeed, look like a third person perspective. I should have created an action like maybe checking the phone or check my watch to show that I am in a first person perspective.

Reflection: Week 8a – “I am being Judged! THEY’RE JUDGING ME!”

Yes, I ripped it off from Lilo & Stitch… Anyways moving along to the main point! Today, we cut down our presentation from last week to 5 minutes tops. The presentation went off with a breeze. After the presentation, we had to sit on the “let-the-judging-begin chair”! Peter answered most of the questions because we showed his sketch on the Korsakow non-narrative sketch. We were pressed for time so we did not present the YouTube Doubler narrative sketch.

Presentation was better than expected as I set up the case study and the first person perspective to the judges and let Peter explain his sketch. Unfortunately, the judges were keen in viewing the YouTube Doubler sketch but I had not been able to present it. The bright side, I did not stumble over my words! I managed to man up (I mean woman up) and deliver my speech to the panel. Their nods and appreciation to what I have said only encouraged me to speak up. The number of presentations we did during the studio session definitely helped me on my stage fright. I still have a lot to work on but it definitely is a start. Questions were asked regarding “gamification” as it was an interesting topic but couldn’t quite put into an online video (unless you have super awesome coding experience) and so we were given effective criticism like using simple techniques to make a complex narrative. The panel suggested to go with the YouTube Doubler. I think that would be our next probe then.

Reflection: Week 7b – “Project THREE Presentation Day!”

Today was the day of presentation for our project three. All my efforts finally paid off. We presented within the time frame. We explained our case study, followed by four of our sketches and ended with our suggestions for project four. However, we still did not articulate our process as well as the others because Seth had to keep asking questions about our findings and relations to the case study. Errol and Nathaniel asked a fair amount of questions as well during our feedback session. Nonetheless, we are getting there to achieve the studio prompt.

 

Reflection: “Filming Narrative Structure”

Today, I finally filmed my first person perspective narrative structure. I had to do a reflection so I would not forget what happened earlier.

The linear narrative of me climbing up the stairs, being a super klutz that day, tripping a lot. I had two friends help me film this sequence while crashing into people. I definitely had difficulty because I could not use both my hands at the same time. It was definitely difficult and I had to play around with that issue and find something to substitute the action with a simpler one.

I shot the first person perspective realising that I did not give much away of who the person’s shoe we are in. Besides the voice of the person during conversations, we could not tell who the person was. It sparked an interest thinking if I split them into two parts, it could possibly be a parallel narrative. With that in mind, I began using the YouTube doubler as my tool to allow viewers to create their parallel story the way they want it to happen.

The whole purpose of creating these sketches were to learn from it and maybe new ideas are created from them. This was exactly what happened to me. I stumbled upon parallel narratives when I started filming. This opened up a few ideas on how viewers can participate in this online video. By splitting the narrative into two parts “before class” and “after class”, viewers can control the cuts between the two narratives.

I figured this problem with the first person perspective could have done a little better if there was a witness or a bystander’s point-of-view instead of the main person’s point-of-view. However, if it was not for the main character’s point-of-view, the parallel narrative would not have worked out. There are different outcomes to different sketches, but this sketch probably have more I could work with. I should see the results once it has been edited and put on YouTube doubler.

  • Archives