Film-TV2- Analysis/Reflection 5 – Question 2

“In 200 words or less please outline you goals, desires – what you want to get out of this semester. You will review this later in the course. You may rethink this dramatically – this is a good thing.”

You were asked this at the beginning of the semester. Now, could you review constructively what you got from this semester – has the course lived up to your expectations, delivered what you expected, maybe even surpassed it?

 The beginning of Semester Film/TV2 Anticipations

Though our documentary still isn’t finished and we spend these last few days fine tuning different aspects, I can definitely say I’m proud of what we have thus far and hope audiences will enjoy it. It’s so fulfilling to see after filming all those Friday nights we have something that not only demonstrates what Larping is about but that explores documentary practice in the depiction of the spectacle. Those nights we would go down and just start filming, action, people, interaction, asking questions and really engaging with the community that exists behind the subjects, allowed us to experience the exploration and interactions that documentary filmmaking is all about. Some of the best moments being on field with a person on camera, someone else on the mixer and a third person to tell the other two when people to move away from the battle that was heading straight towards them.

Furthermore, I believe our film is, “refined in technique and construction,” and am happy that we took a collective decision to create something that expressed the form of documentary in a creative way, by getting the participants to speak in character and transporting the viewer into the world these people inhabit every week. Though we had some issues with technique along the way, such as technical problems with the grain of shots and audio pitching, we worked collectively within the group to come to accept these mistakes and learn from them in the following weeks.

I’ve enjoyed the documentary process right from the beginning, this in part can be attributed to the great group we had as we all got along really well and shared an enthusiasm for the project from the first day. It made the processes required not only so much easier but exciting to achieve, and reassuring to know that we had the ability to voice our opinions and concerns freely. Each person brought another element to the production process and we all worked collaboratively taking turns in the construction. We didn’t assign specific roles to members but instead allowed people to have a go at doing different elements and worked individually to do things where we saw necessary. Personally, this included the, “opportunity to deal on the technical side of shooting,” with filming on field and recording audio allowing me the chance to build the technical knowledge needed in documentary production. Looking back at the choice of subject for the documentary, “I hope[d] to choose something interesting and that I may not have much knowledge about,” which I believed was achieved as I had little knowledge about Larping before the idea was brought up in class, I didn’t even know there were battles at Princess Park every Friday night, and the whole production has intrigued me as much as I hope it will intrigue the viewer.

From an analytical side I aspired to develop my ability to, “analyse documentary programs as a practice and how to apply that knowledge to my own work and others,” and believe such things as the lectures have served an inspiration for this practice, with the weeks where we’d filter through fifteen different documentaries and look at the style of interviews or watch a past student’s work really helping to build this understanding. Furthermore, this course has also allowed me to develop a greater appreciation for the documentary process and all that it involves, individually as well as a part of a team, to create something that is distinctly ours.

“And finally to have fun and enjoy the whole process because before you know it twelve weeks are gone,” and sure enough they did pass by fast, but I look back knowing I have enjoyed the whole semester. I’ve learnt key elements of production, forged relationships and an outlook on the making of documentary as a platform for me to learn invaluable skills for the future.

Film-TV2- Analysis/Reflection 5 – Question 1

As per lecture – in a sequence you’ve called ‘colour’ you will have clips that are indicative of a particular colour or lighting state. To the right of that clip you will have the same clip repeated 2 or more times with different colour grades on it.

Take screen grabs of each clip then upload to you blog the series of stills that show us ‘before and afters’ of your colour grading. Provide a few different examples of at least two different clips – each with a description of what you did to the clip and why. 

Having to deal with some of our shots coming out grainy due to a filer accidentally being left on during a shoot day, much of the colour grading in the editing stage was to match the aesthetic of footage over the whole documentary. In time we’ve come to accept the graininess of these earlier shots and believe they’ve become a key visual style of our piece, however colour grading will be used to bring the original shots to the best quality and add vibrancy to the colours of the world of Althea.

First Grade

Colour_Grading_Original_1The original shot depicts a soldier with his shield ready for battle

Colour_Grading_Darkened_1We darkened this second image by making the midtones more blue, emphasising the shadowing across the subject. We also reduced the output levels to reduce the brightness of the shot and made his face more skin like by making the highlights pinker.

Colour_Grading_Brightened_1

This third image is a brightened version where we made the midtones warmer bringing them to orange, this gives life to the subjects face and adds a mystical glow around him. We also made the shot a bit darker by lowering the output and making shadows more blue. As orange and blue are complimentary colours they come together to give the finished shot a harmony, making the shot visually pleasing for the viewer.

Second Grade

Colour_Grading_Original_2

In the original shot we see a war-band advancing onto the field to fight

Colour_Grading_Darkened_2This image was made darker by bringing down the output level and making the highlights greener so that it blends with the subjects better. The shadows are also a darker blue contrasting against the midtones at a light blue, developing the scene to look like a dark night and heightening visual impact for the viewer.

Colour_Grading_Brightened_2

We brightened this shot from the original by raising the input levels to create more shadowing on the field. By making the midtones and highlights more green the grass becomes more vibrant and the reds also appear brighter therefore making the costumes of the participants stand out.

Third Grade

Colour_Grading_Original_3

A battler sits and watches the battle waiting to re-spawn

Colour_Grading_Three_Way_Colour_Corrector_3

This image appears cooler than the original by making the master a deep red for warmth in the mid-ground and green in the midtones to emphase the grass in the foreground. The highlights are also brighter with a light yellow/pink, giving a soft edge to the outline of the subjects.

Colour_Grading_Brightened_3

By experimenting with brightness and contrast, bringing the brightness to -5.7 and contrast to -0.2 the shot appears sharper than the original. Also made the shadows warmer, midtones greener and highlights pinker to give that underlying warmth to the scene.

The gift of Reality Television

Week Ten – Reality TV – Origins and Contexts

Reality TV is, “a catch-all category,” that includes a range of entertainment programmes about, “real people” (Hill, A; 2005). The idea of the real is paramount to many of the shows considered a part of the genre and, “this access to the real… presented in the name of dramatic uncertainty, voyeurism, and popular pleasure,” (Ouelette, L and Murray, S; 2009) in turn have become a marketing tool for these shows.

The genre, “is located in border territories, between information and entertainment, documentary and drama,” (Hill, A; 2005) with documentary in particular being an important relationship. These types of shows, “associations with documentary… [and] hybridisation of fictional and factual programme styles,” allow its intersection with everyday life and ordinary people (Kavka, M;2012). One Born Every Minute (2010) fits within lifestyle programming, appealing primarily to women and expectant mothers. By analysing the story and production elements of Season One, Episode Four, we can gain a further understanding of why the show can be considered a docu-soap through such things as characters, interviews, narrative, camerawork, and editing.

One_Born_Every_Minute_Main

The show’s subject matter is expecting mothers and their families coming into the hospital’s labour ward, ordinary people as they go through an extraordinary experience. The show is built around these visiting characters, the nurses merely acting as hosts to the show adding there accounts when relevant. The show is structured to make a form of entertainment through the different relationship the viewer has with the families and the nurses. Characters are also used to contrast on each other, for example in this episode we meet Joy, Kelly and their families. Kelly’s family is quite unconventional with their relationship and she’s familiar to the process of childbirth becoming pregnant at seventeen. Tensions are then built by contrasting Joy and Fabio, two immigrants with no extending family and a wealth of money, but their inability to have a child for many years until IVF finally worked underlies how precious this birth is to them.

Consequently the narrative is very character based and the show uses parallel stories, like many other Reality TV shows, to reveal the underlying ideal that the show is fundamentally not around birth at all but more so the relationships that are achieved and tested in the process. For example, the point of connection with the new mid-wife on the ward delivering her first child and Joy giving birth to her first child. There is also a rhythm to the show in relation to drama, as we have spent more time with Joy in her many days on the ward we become anxious for her when she finally goes into the theatre; while we only meet Kelly half way through the episode and her presence doesn’t resonate quite as much.

To further this notion of reality the main interviews don’t appear staged, though there are some moments where there’s an interview of family members, such as Kelly’s sister, that have been staged for either dramatic effect or to further establish the broader family role. Camera style then follows with fixed camera angles, high angles to depict the hospital walls and slow motion shots. This adds a voyeuristic feel to the scenes and makes the viewer feel as though we’re seeing something we shouldn’t be, with everyday CCTV and family home interviews an obvious influences to these shots. The editing of these shots also works to condense time and space so that the piece has rhythm.

Music is used to weave from action to action and to allow emotional connection through events, for example we hear the lullaby-ish music as when Joy goes into the operating theatre to further the emotion the pair feels. Otherwise the lack of music creates pauses between dialogue as you would hear in reality. Dialogue is also used to further establish the characters we are watching, such as Joy’s continued disbelief of “the whole hand” and comments to Fabio on him eating “half a kilo of yogurt” adding some well needed breadth in scenes. Furthermore, when interviews or music is not occurring there’s sometimes the use of voiceover to keep the viewer up to date on the narrative.

One Born Every Minute demonstrates how a show can be layered through different forms of narrative elements to achieve its genre. The show exhibits how Reality TV can take on a documentary style to illustrate itself as real, with the existence of these types of shows as a way to maintain an understanding of difference between the real and mediated.

References

Hill, A 2005. Reality TV: Audiences And Popular Factual Television, Routledge, London & New York, pp. 1-14.

Kavka, M 2012.Reality TV, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 1-13.

Ouelette, L and Murray, S 2009. Reality TV: Remaking Television Culture, New York University Press, New York & London, pp. 1-20.

Which Matthew McConaughey is present?

Week Eight – The Poetics of Complex Narrative

HBO has built a brand identity and status around series that are distinguished by complex narratives, with shows such as The Sopranos (1999), Six Feet Under (2001), Curb Your Enthusiasm (1999), The Wire (2002) and Game of Thrones (2011) examples of this. By looking at the pilot episode of HBO’s latest, “Sunday night crime drama,” (Hale, M; 2014) True Detective (2014) we can see how, “complex television employs a range of serial techniques,” with the underlying theory that, “a series is a cumulative narrative that builds over time, rather than resetting back to a steady-state equilibrium at the end of every episode” (Mittel, J; 2014).

True_Detective_Main

The show traces two Louisiana State Police Criminal Investigations Division homicide detectives, Detective Rust Cohle (Matthew McConaughey) and Detective Marty Hart (Woody Harrelson) in their search for a serial killer across seventeen years. The show takes on a stereotypical police procedural shell and then hybrids this genre in the forms of thriller, drama and southern gothic to form an immersive story world that help lure the audience in. Through this world the show demands, “intensified viewer engagement focused on both diegetic pleasure and formal awareness” (Mittell, J; 2014) and requires a form of deep attention from the viewer. The framework of the show is not anything new, with the pilot episode setting up a ritualistic murder of a woman, to which Cohle suspects a serial killer and no one but Hart believes him. But what is innovative is the shows, “chilly, restrained mood of foreboding,” the narrative (Hale, M; 2014). This aspect is partly achieved due to the anthology format of the series, meaning that each season there is a different cast of characters and story, therefore blurring the line between cinema and television as the show occurs more like a mini-series. Furthermore, the long-form and plot narrative also mean each episode doesn’t necessarily guarantee some sort of ideological closure or reassurance for the viewer, thus allowing their engagement with the show to exist over the series rather than a single episode.

Complex narrative can be viewed in terms of a mode of television storytelling that is orientated around the narrative events of kernels and satellites as a way to connect and give importance to events within the narrative. We can view the partnership between Cohle and Marty as a kernel, a, “narrative moment[s] that give rise to cruxes in the direction taken by events,” and are central to the cause-and-effect of the plot; as it’s their relationship that is key to the development of this case and story. While something like Cohle buying drinks for the women at the bar can be seen as a satellite, “a minor plot event,” that can be deleted without disturbing the logic of the plot, “though the omission will… impoverish the narrative aesthetically” (Chatman, S;1978) as it develops Cohles character and lost-hope view on life. Satellites are therefore more about an idea of texture and tone in the world building of the show, in order to, “complet[e] the kernel… [and] form the flesh on the skeleton” (Chatman, S; 1978).

True_Detective_Office

True Detective’s skeletal core resides in the story being told in, “two tracks: in 1995, when Cohle and Hart begin their investigation, and in 2012, when the case has been reopened, and both are being questioned by a second set of detectives” (Hale, M; 2014). Through this use of temporal structure, clues are gathered surrounding the original case in 1995 and the audience begins to be shown what went wrong with it. The pilot episode differentiates these two tracks with the differences in characters – Cohle is physically different having grown a beard and Marty being agitated as he talks about his relationship with Cohle – and in the aesthetics of the filming – with the footage being grainy to emulate a police interview video. Throughout the episode we keep going back to these roomed interviews and it’s not until we enter the room through the lens of the detective’s camera that we are placed in the present space with Cohle. The use of fractured time lines and the neglect to situate the viewer in these moments give the show depth and alludes to the complex relationship these two men have.

True_Detective_Mathew_McConaughey

Distinctive of the show is only having two key character stories driving the narrative, which is reinforced by the female characters not really having established characters but being cardboard cut-outs for the main characters to interact and have another form of relationship with. This idea of masculinity is significant of the HBO brand, along with the high production values of the show making it cinematic in style. The show’s use of space is particularly filmic, from divided Police office sets and broad landscapes, displaying the broken humanity in a wrecked America.

The pilot episode of True Detective is exemplary of how complex narrative elements can come together to make a show quality television. Through the use of such things as fractured time lines, a hybrid genre and cinematic aesthetics, the show identifies and markets itself as a multifaceted engagement all about the journey and not the destination.

References

Chatman, S 1978. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film, Cornell Univeristy Press, United States of America, pp. 53-56.

Hale, M. ‘A Coupling as Bizarre as the Murder: McConaughey and Harrelson Star on ‘True Detective,’ on HBO,’ The New York Times, 2014: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/11/arts/television/mcconaughey-and-harrelson-star-in-true-detective-on-hbo.html?_r=0, October 2014.

Mittel, J 2014, ‘Complex TV’, Media Commons Press, http://mcpress.media-commons.org/complextelevision/complexity/, October 2014.

Blood tastes better than you’d thought

Week Six – Audiences and Matters of Taste

Standing in the cereal aisle at the supermarket it’s easy to get overwhelmed by the shelves and the abundance of breakfast items to choose from, everything down to the minuscule details of toasted without fruit or non-toasted with fruit muesli. We live in a world governed by taste and the ideal that we as an audience think we have the ability to choose, however what we should never forget is in the end it’s all just muesli.

The idea of taste is a natural thing that we create and develop as humans throughout our lives and pop culture plays into this in terms of forming identities. Therefore, identities can be defined and reinvented through what you buy and what you associate with. By associating yourself with watching certain shows you build an identity that, “distinguishes [you] in an essential way,” to be an individual, but also, “whereby one classifies oneself and is classified by others” (Bourdieu, P; 1984).Through this taste becomes about the lines of cultural knowledge, with television determining desirable and undesirable forms of culture through the types of shows being watched. For example there are the high-end HBO productions compared to the low-end reality television shows, this division continually becoming more blurred within today’s contemporary television landscape.

Bourdieu notes that as taste is a product of conditionings associated with a particular class of condition of existence, “it unites all those who are the product of similar conditions while distinguishing them from all others” (Bourdieu, P; 1984). Audiences display their taste through the cultural formation of fandoms, providing cultural place for those who have the same taste in television. Vampire and horror genres of television have culminated the formation of fandoms since the gothic-soap Dark Shadows (1966) and their cult following allows for associative audiences. However, the vampire and gothic genre, “is not generally associated within popular culture with notions of quality, but rather with cult film, trash culture and juvenile audiences,” and this was the calculated risk  well-known quality television network HBO took when it released its flagship programme for 2008 True Blood (Abbott, S cited in Cherry, B; 2012).

True_Blood_Main

True Blood contest genre conception by taking the undesirable forms of culture and presenting them in a HBO tasteful way, seen in, “a number of factors in production of the series,” which has developed the shows, “status as cult TV” (Cherry, B; 2012). It is seen as one of HBOs most controversial shows; “free from the constraints normally imposed on mainstream television” the show employs, “liberal amounts of sex, violence and swearing as well as serious or adult themes in an artful and stylised package” (Cherry, B; 2012). The most fitting example of this “artful and stylised” package can be understood through the opening credit sequence where the show is overviewed through a broader and more abstract context. The sequences not only conceptualises the show at the beginning of each episode, it also acts to encode certain ideals applicable to the show to demonstrates the type of decoding audience the show is appealing to.

The opening credits work so that the initiation of the sequence is not at the beginning of the show, but after an introductory plot development so that the episode can be re-contextualised to the reality the credits ensue. The images are eerie and dark, with the juxtaposition of life and death, and a mix between the historical world it references and the story world the show is about remains depicted and contested. Southern subject matter such as images of forests, swamps, crocodiles and desolate landscapes are prevalent within the sequence, conveying the genre of Southern Gothic layered in the shows episodes and the importance of place within the show as a way for the audience to understand the setting and people. This idea of the south is further achieved through Jace Everett’s “Bad Things” (2005) interpretation of country music with a Southern soul music base. The aesthetic style uses grainy shots, time lapse delays and documentary footage giving the shots a scientific and naturalistic enquiry as a way to relate the viewer. The piece also juxtaposes life and death in a way to pull the two together to illustrate how they’re not that different, for example the red fox decomposing, a link to the undead being an eminent trait of vampires. There is also a sprout of sexuality and death, with the show being driven by exploring what and how things happen when violence and sexuality collide as a contrast between natural processes and their unnatural ramifications.

True_Blood_Opening_Credits

The opening credit sequence doesn’t outwardly connect the following show to the subject matter of vampires, but instead offers a general emotion and feeling to symbolise the show itself. Therefore by solely analysing this reoccurring sequence we can further understand how taste culture influences audiences to be active in decoding their choices in television, with True Blood being an example of a show that deliberately encodes overt social issues.

References

Bourdieu, P 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard University Press, United States of America, pp. 1-63.

Cherry, B 2012. True Blood: Investigating Vampires and Southern Gothic, I.B. Tauris, London & New York, pp. 1-38.