Roj Amedi Interview

As part of the Room With a View Course, I interviewed writer and refugee advocate  Roj Amedi.

Aside from being a refugee justice and human rights advocate, Roj is an incredible public speaker and writer for such organisations as The Satuday Paper, with a background in international relations. A former refugee from Iraq, she has significant lived experience that those who make decisions for refugee and immigration law lack. I’m satisfied with how the interview ended up in this edit. However, I feel there are moments where my lack of skill and experience is obvious, particularly when it’s contrasted with Roj’s excellent and detailed responses. I think in the future, I could prepare my questions a little better, making them shorter and speak more clealry to result in a cleaner interview.
Whilst I originally planned to talk to Roj for around 10 minutes, the interview ended up going twenty minutes overtime, simply because she provided such incredible and insightful views on the state of the world. The interview linked below is an edited version that is around 12 minutes in length.

Below is the interview with annotations below it.

Annotations:

0:06My idea with the introduction here was based of ‘Intercepted’, a podcast by Jeremy Scahill. I find it is a lot more elegant and allows the interview to stand on its own

0:20I don’t like the tone I use on ‘organisations’ here. I am aiming for a relaxed tonal feel, and this didn’t quite cut it for me.

0:28I think that the relaxed tone here works quite well, particularly because it is serious themes that we are discussing

0:48My strategy here with Roj introducing herself was to have her explain the things about herself that she’d like people to know. I think it worked well, as considering what shes experienced, me introducing her would have seemed condescending.

1:25Because we are discussing the complicated topic of politics, I’ve found it necessary to put a lot of the context into my questions.

4:05Originally the interview was a lot longer. Therefore, I had to cut some of Roj’s answers together. I think it works quite well. The reason I did it was only if she repeated points that she had already made.

4:36It may seem as though I am being quite sporadic with my questioning. This wasn’t my original attention. However, because my interview went so overtime, I was forced to cut a lot of content that didn’t cover enough ground.

6:38In between here I had a whole discussion about climate change. However, due to time constraints I was unfortunately forced to cut it out in its entirety.

6:38I regret not challenging Roj on her point here. It’s a big statement that I probably should have questioned her on a bit more, as she deals in a lot of absolutes here.

8:03I didn’t ask Roj to elaborate here on the issues surrounding First Australians. This was partly because I didn’t want too many ideas to be thrown around, as well as not feeling equipped to discuss it.

9:30This questioning about the value of the UN and Roj’s response is a moment that is obviously quite embarrassing for me. However, I didn’t take it out because I know a disregard for the UN is something that a lot of people feel. Therefore, Roj’s response was something that was confronting and moving.

11:07I probably should have provided an explanation for what the 1951 treaty was here, as a lot of listeners may not be aware of what it is.

12:09I think this was a good note to finish on, as it brings the conversation back to Australia and things that the listeners can actually change.

12:55This idea of having the interviewee say ways to find them was an idea I heard from podcasts. Rather than me telling the listeners where to find out more about Roj, letting her explain it herself allows it to be just another part of the interview. It also allows her to identify her preferred places for information to be found.

Leave a Reply

Skip to toolbar